Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 151 - 160 of 63243 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 151 - 160 of 63243 for Motion for joint custody.
Rosemary G. O'Brien v. Craig P. O'Brien
with Rosemary. She contends that this order is inconsistent with the concept of joint legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14679 - 2005-03-31
with Rosemary. She contends that this order is inconsistent with the concept of joint legal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14679 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. The stipulation prescribed: (1) joint legal custody to both parents; (2) primary physical placement to Stephanie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68131 - 2011-07-19
. The stipulation prescribed: (1) joint legal custody to both parents; (2) primary physical placement to Stephanie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68131 - 2011-07-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
which custody was to be exchanged. It therefore denied Przytarski’s motion for contempt. Przytarski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68131 - 2014-09-15
which custody was to be exchanged. It therefore denied Przytarski’s motion for contempt. Przytarski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68131 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Nanette M.M. v. Gerald J.M.
on September 11, 1991. The judgment provided for joint custody of the couple's three children, Sean, Collin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8911 - 2017-09-19
on September 11, 1991. The judgment provided for joint custody of the couple's three children, Sean, Collin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8911 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Nanette M.M. v. Gerald J.M.
on September 11, 1991. The judgment provided for joint custody of the couple's three children, Sean, Collin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9508 - 2017-09-19
on September 11, 1991. The judgment provided for joint custody of the couple's three children, Sean, Collin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9508 - 2017-09-19
Leea N. Power v. James M. Muhammad
of the divorce reflects that the parties agreed to have joint legal custody of Joshua with primary placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17971 - 2005-05-02
of the divorce reflects that the parties agreed to have joint legal custody of Joshua with primary placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17971 - 2005-05-02
[PDF]
Leea N. Power v. James M. Muhammad
calling for joint custody, and the Family Court Commissioner who presided over the divorce hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17971 - 2017-09-21
calling for joint custody, and the Family Court Commissioner who presided over the divorce hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17971 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Expedited Motion for Stay (Wisconsin Legislature)
, Intervenors-Respondents. EXPEDITED MOTION FOR A STAY PENDING APPEAL BY THE WISCONSIN LEGISLATURE
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/expeditedmotionstay.pdf - 2022-03-04
, Intervenors-Respondents. EXPEDITED MOTION FOR A STAY PENDING APPEAL BY THE WISCONSIN LEGISLATURE
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/expeditedmotionstay.pdf - 2022-03-04
Malachi Watkins v. Michelle Watkins
Watkins), appeals the order dismissing her post-judgment motion seeking to modify the custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2610 - 2005-03-31
Watkins), appeals the order dismissing her post-judgment motion seeking to modify the custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2610 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Malachi Watkins v. Michelle Watkins
. ¶4 The divorce judgment provided for joint custody of Nathan and alternating periods of placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2610 - 2017-09-19
. ¶4 The divorce judgment provided for joint custody of Nathan and alternating periods of placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2610 - 2017-09-19