Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 151 - 160 of 556 for widths.
Search results 151 - 160 of 556 for widths.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Washington could not possibly have thrown the gun that far. Taking into account the width of the road
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106317 - 2017-09-21
that Washington could not possibly have thrown the gun that far. Taking into account the width of the road
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106317 - 2017-09-21
Samuel Bonanno v. Lewis Borsellino
-of-way for owners of Lots A-C” being 12 feet in width, together with an equal undivided one-half
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8762 - 2005-03-31
-of-way for owners of Lots A-C” being 12 feet in width, together with an equal undivided one-half
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8762 - 2005-03-31
Lillie M. Jones v. Wisconsin County Mutual Insurance Corporation
to the landing before and after one enters the door, not the landing that extends the width of the door. Also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4206 - 2005-03-31
to the landing before and after one enters the door, not the landing that extends the width of the door. Also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4206 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
John C. Stelpflug v. Town Board
estate to a public highway but that such road or way is too narrow, giving its width, to afford
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17315 - 2017-09-21
estate to a public highway but that such road or way is too narrow, giving its width, to afford
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17315 - 2017-09-21
Charles J. Mueller v. Diana M. Kearns
a non-exclusive easement for ingress, egress, and utilities thirty feet in width and 600 feet long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3129 - 2005-03-31
a non-exclusive easement for ingress, egress, and utilities thirty feet in width and 600 feet long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3129 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the roadway, or to improve the traveled width any further towards the land of the Pelletts, or to place any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68252 - 2014-09-15
on the roadway, or to improve the traveled width any further towards the land of the Pelletts, or to place any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68252 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Charles J. Mueller v. Diana M. Kearns
, egress, and utilities thirty feet in width and 600 feet long. The specified easement runs from 20th
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3129 - 2017-09-19
, egress, and utilities thirty feet in width and 600 feet long. The specified easement runs from 20th
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3129 - 2017-09-19
John C. Stelpflug v. Town Board
that the Town of Waukesha should construct a public highway, two rods in width, over a portion of Lot 125, Lot
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17315 - 2005-03-31
that the Town of Waukesha should construct a public highway, two rods in width, over a portion of Lot 125, Lot
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17315 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
] does not have any right to extend its improvements on the roadway, or to improve the traveled width any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68252 - 2011-07-18
] does not have any right to extend its improvements on the roadway, or to improve the traveled width any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68252 - 2011-07-18
Alton B. Ison, Jr. v. Lucille V. Nefstead
that, if read literally, would be impossible. The deed describes the driveway as “30 feet in width
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14562 - 2005-03-31
that, if read literally, would be impossible. The deed describes the driveway as “30 feet in width
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14562 - 2005-03-31