Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15001 - 15010 of 50122 for our.

State v. Terry V. Anderson
the appeal was concluded. Upon remand from our court, the trial court conducted a restitution hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12565 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
his postconviction motion seeking 321 additional days of sentence credit. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=662117 - 2023-05-31

Town of Dunkirk v. City of Stoughton
, and that it was corrected. We agree with the Town that Schaefer provides the proper framework for our analysis, but we do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4849 - 2005-03-31

WI App 136 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP220 Complete Title of...
appeals. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶7 Our review of arbitration awards is limited but includes whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103248 - 2013-11-19

[PDF] WI App 185
of law that we review de novo. Haase, 293 Wis. 2d 322, ¶5. Our interpretation of § 973.20 is guided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34461 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
notes our standard of review. “The grant or denial of a declaratory judgment is addressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141255 - 2017-09-21

State v. Michael Strutz
’ elements. We therefore begin our analysis by reviewing this record to determine whether it supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14593 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Ronald W. Wolfe
only if our confidence in the outcome is so No. 02-3076-CR 4 undermined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5896 - 2017-09-19

Patrick P. Fee v. Board of Review for the Town of Florence
, 191 Wis. 2d 301, 311-12, 529 N.W.2d 245 (Ct. App. 1995). ¶8 In Reiss, our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5434 - 2005-03-31

Heritage Mutual Insurance Company v. Galina Graser
. § 802.08(2) (1999-2000).[2] ¶8 We begin our discussion by reviewing the collateral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4292 - 2005-03-31