Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15001 - 15010 of 82978 for simple case search.
Search results 15001 - 15010 of 82978 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). This case would have involved the discretionary surcharge. On June 30, 2013, the legislature enacted 2013
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141209 - 2017-09-21
). This case would have involved the discretionary surcharge. On June 30, 2013, the legislature enacted 2013
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141209 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Thus, the maximum penalty that Mora would have faced upon a conviction for felony murder in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97974 - 2014-09-15
. Thus, the maximum penalty that Mora would have faced upon a conviction for felony murder in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97974 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
in this case, and provided: Upon request by a party, the court may modify the amount of child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30147 - 2014-09-15
in this case, and provided: Upon request by a party, the court may modify the amount of child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30147 - 2014-09-15
State v. Karl D. Heppner
that a constitutional right may be forfeited in criminal as well as civil cases by the failure to make timely assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13239 - 2005-03-31
that a constitutional right may be forfeited in criminal as well as civil cases by the failure to make timely assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13239 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
search the record to determine whether it provides a rational basis for the court’s discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36843 - 2009-06-17
search the record to determine whether it provides a rational basis for the court’s discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36843 - 2009-06-17
[PDF]
State v. Dillis V. Allen
in this case does not ignore Schoepp as Allen argues; rather, it grants the State a protective order, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3605 - 2017-09-19
in this case does not ignore Schoepp as Allen argues; rather, it grants the State a protective order, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3605 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
that Dubose was decided after his trial, but argues that it applies to this case because new constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32212 - 2008-03-24
that Dubose was decided after his trial, but argues that it applies to this case because new constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32212 - 2008-03-24
[PDF]
State v. Karl D. Heppner
is more familiar … than that a constitutional right may be forfeited in criminal as well as civil cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13239 - 2017-09-21
is more familiar … than that a constitutional right may be forfeited in criminal as well as civil cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13239 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, we may, but are not required to, search the Record to determine whether that Record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30147 - 2007-09-04
, we may, but are not required to, search the Record to determine whether that Record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30147 - 2007-09-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
645 (Ct. App. 1999). No. 2011AP1757-CR 3 ¶4 The statute at issue in the instant case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75106 - 2014-09-15
645 (Ct. App. 1999). No. 2011AP1757-CR 3 ¶4 The statute at issue in the instant case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75106 - 2014-09-15