Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15021 - 15030 of 29823 for des.
Search results 15021 - 15030 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo.’” Bokenyi, 355 Wis. 2d 28, ¶38 (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670974 - 2023-06-27
of a plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo.’” Bokenyi, 355 Wis. 2d 28, ¶38 (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670974 - 2023-06-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by police; and those made after 8:12 p.m. “by de facto police proxies and/or resulting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=441044 - 2021-10-14
by police; and those made after 8:12 p.m. “by de facto police proxies and/or resulting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=441044 - 2021-10-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. Krier v. Vilione, 2009 WI 45, ¶14, 317 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56782 - 2014-09-15
a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. Krier v. Vilione, 2009 WI 45, ¶14, 317 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56782 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional fact for our de novo review. See State v. Stutesman, 221 Wis. 2d 178, 182, 585 N.W.2d 181 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132817 - 2017-09-21
of constitutional fact for our de novo review. See State v. Stutesman, 221 Wis. 2d 178, 182, 585 N.W.2d 181 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132817 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
.” We conclude this difference is de minimus and reject Buettgen’s argument. ¶11 Buettgen insists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35394 - 2009-02-02
.” We conclude this difference is de minimus and reject Buettgen’s argument. ¶11 Buettgen insists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35394 - 2009-02-02
[PDF]
J.L. Phillips & Associates, Inc. v. E & H Plastic Corporation
)(a). As a question of statutory interpretation, this issue is a question of law that we review de novo, without
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17178 - 2017-09-21
)(a). As a question of statutory interpretation, this issue is a question of law that we review de novo, without
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17178 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the referee's conclusions of law de novo. Alia, 2006 WI 12, ¶39. We determine the appropriate level
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144557 - 2017-09-21
the referee's conclusions of law de novo. Alia, 2006 WI 12, ¶39. We determine the appropriate level
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144557 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Kohler Company v. Sogen International Fund, Inc.
on a question of law is de novo. See State ex rel. Bilder v. Township of Delavan, 112 Wis. 2d 539, 549, 334
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15369 - 2017-09-21
on a question of law is de novo. See State ex rel. Bilder v. Township of Delavan, 112 Wis. 2d 539, 549, 334
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15369 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
this court reviews de novo. Hokin, 231 Wis. 2d at 191. When the circuit court’s exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47804 - 2014-09-15
this court reviews de novo. Hokin, 231 Wis. 2d at 191. When the circuit court’s exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47804 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
106, ¶9, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192158 - 2017-09-21
106, ¶9, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. This is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192158 - 2017-09-21