Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15021 - 15030 of 34005 for dismissal.

COURT OF APPEALS
a no-contest plea to one count of burglary. A charge of second-degree sexual assault was dismissed as part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66108 - 2011-06-20

[PDF] Frontsheet
of the property, and her claims against the public utility were properly dismissed. I. BACKGROUND ¶4
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488611 - 2022-04-12

[PDF] Holly Lynn Weiss v. City of Milwaukee
of appeals decision which affirmed a summary judgment dismissal of her complaint against the defendants
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16895 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The Estate of Roberto Placido Sandoval appeals from a judgment of the circuit court dismissing his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516405 - 2022-05-03

[PDF] CA Blank Order
predecessor appellate counsel voluntarily dismissed two of those prior appeals before filing a no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=574145 - 2022-10-11

[PDF] State v. John Casteel
, Nos. 97-0171 and 97-0172, unpublished slip op. at 1 (Wis. Ct. App. May 15, 1997), we dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3171 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
appeals a judgment dismissing his adverse possession counterclaim against ADEM LLC. Weckler argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=359713 - 2021-04-27

[PDF] CA Blank Order
convictions and moved to dismiss and read in the remaining eighteen charges. The circuit court accepted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485574 - 2022-02-22

Glacier State Distribution Services, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
a summary judgment dismissing its action challenging the Department of Transportation’s inclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12942 - 2005-03-31

Jeffrey Loy v. Dodgeville School District
of law dismissing this claim. We also conclude that all defendants are entitled to immunity under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6690 - 2005-03-31