Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15031 - 15040 of 30072 for de.
Search results 15031 - 15040 of 30072 for de.
[PDF]
WI App 7
of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. Adams, 294 Wis. 2d 441, ¶26. ¶15 Where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57747 - 2014-09-15
of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. Adams, 294 Wis. 2d 441, ¶26. ¶15 Where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57747 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Daniel Ray Sharp v. Robert G. Vick
Standard of Review. ¶7 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5349 - 2017-09-19
Standard of Review. ¶7 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5349 - 2017-09-19
Gary L. Addison v. Grant County
the Adamses, based on the facts as found by the trial court, presents a question of law, which we decided de
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11022 - 2005-03-31
the Adamses, based on the facts as found by the trial court, presents a question of law, which we decided de
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11022 - 2005-03-31
Lafayette County Human Services v. Gary A.S.
of statutory construction, a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2340 - 2005-03-31
of statutory construction, a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2340 - 2005-03-31
Kohler Company v. Sogen International Fund, Inc.
in that action is a question of law. Our review of a trial court’s decision on a question of law is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15369 - 2005-03-31
in that action is a question of law. Our review of a trial court’s decision on a question of law is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15369 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 161
(citations omitted). Whether charges are multiplicitous is a question of law subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41725 - 2014-09-15
(citations omitted). Whether charges are multiplicitous is a question of law subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41725 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
briefing and their assumptions, even on our de novo review, that the circuit court properly determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242341 - 2019-06-18
briefing and their assumptions, even on our de novo review, that the circuit court properly determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242341 - 2019-06-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
standard, we review that contention de novo. Id. at 120. ¶16 Motions to modify child placement orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90737 - 2014-09-15
standard, we review that contention de novo. Id. at 120. ¶16 Motions to modify child placement orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90737 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Denis Collins v. Andrew Policano
. 227. Thus, the question before us is largely one of statutory interpretation, which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15063 - 2017-09-21
. 227. Thus, the question before us is largely one of statutory interpretation, which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15063 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Edward A. Hannan v. Thomas W. Godfrey
of law, which this court reviews de novo. WISCONSIN STAT. § 805.06 authorizes a court to appoint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15460 - 2017-09-21
of law, which this court reviews de novo. WISCONSIN STAT. § 805.06 authorizes a court to appoint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15460 - 2017-09-21