Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15031 - 15040 of 68921 for he.
Search results 15031 - 15040 of 68921 for he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the parcel but are not part of the subdivision. He purchased a residential property to the north
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872463 - 2024-11-06
the parcel but are not part of the subdivision. He purchased a residential property to the north
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872463 - 2024-11-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
contends that he presented a new factor in his motion for sentence modification by showing that he would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214228 - 2018-06-12
contends that he presented a new factor in his motion for sentence modification by showing that he would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214228 - 2018-06-12
State v. Karem Scott
” and intended to conduct a “field interview” of the man seen exiting the house. He later testified that as he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10667 - 2005-03-31
” and intended to conduct a “field interview” of the man seen exiting the house. He later testified that as he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10667 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dwight J.
rights to his daughter, Ebony M., after a jury found that he had failed to assume
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3898 - 2017-09-20
rights to his daughter, Ebony M., after a jury found that he had failed to assume
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3898 - 2017-09-20
R.M. Iverson v. City of River Falls
a judgment dismissing his claim of excessive property tax assessment. He argues (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8997 - 2005-03-31
a judgment dismissing his claim of excessive property tax assessment. He argues (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8997 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to object during cross-examination of two of the State’s witnesses. First, he contended his trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767300 - 2024-02-28
to object during cross-examination of two of the State’s witnesses. First, he contended his trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767300 - 2024-02-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” is that the court lacked a sufficient factual basis to find that he improperly refused to submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233258 - 2019-01-24
” is that the court lacked a sufficient factual basis to find that he improperly refused to submit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233258 - 2019-01-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
“a revocation in which he is currently incarcerated within.” Lietz raised three arguments: (1) the rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622248 - 2023-02-14
“a revocation in which he is currently incarcerated within.” Lietz raised three arguments: (1) the rule
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622248 - 2023-02-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report, he asserted that counsel did not provide him with a copy of the report or the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714036 - 2023-10-12
to the no-merit report, he asserted that counsel did not provide him with a copy of the report or the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714036 - 2023-10-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report, he asserted that counsel did not provide him with a copy of the report or the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714036 - 2023-10-12
to the no-merit report, he asserted that counsel did not provide him with a copy of the report or the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=714036 - 2023-10-12