Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15051 - 15060 of 30172 for de.
Search results 15051 - 15060 of 30172 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79, ¶12, 292 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64702 - 2014-09-15
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Booker, 2006 WI 79, ¶12, 292 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64702 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 433. Whether a motion raises sufficient facts is a question of law we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=298905 - 2020-10-28
N.W.2d 433. Whether a motion raises sufficient facts is a question of law we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=298905 - 2020-10-28
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the referee's conclusions of law de novo. Alia, 2006 WI 12, ¶39. We determine the appropriate level
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144557 - 2017-09-21
the referee's conclusions of law de novo. Alia, 2006 WI 12, ¶39. We determine the appropriate level
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144557 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191156 - 2017-09-21
of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191156 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Steven F. Weynand v. Lucille R. Weynand Foster
1 This is the subject of Appeal No. 99-0976. No. 99-0976 99-1607 6 de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15662 - 2017-09-21
1 This is the subject of Appeal No. 99-0976. No. 99-0976 99-1607 6 de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15662 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Brian W. Sprang
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. A breach is material and substantial when it “defeats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6786 - 2017-09-20
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. A breach is material and substantial when it “defeats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6786 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
standard, we review that contention de novo. Id. at 120. ¶16 Motions to modify child placement orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90737 - 2014-09-15
standard, we review that contention de novo. Id. at 120. ¶16 Motions to modify child placement orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90737 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 161
(citations omitted). Whether charges are multiplicitous is a question of law subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41725 - 2014-09-15
(citations omitted). Whether charges are multiplicitous is a question of law subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41725 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a grant of summary judgment de novo. Brey v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2020 WI App 45, ¶12, 393
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=345103 - 2021-03-11
a grant of summary judgment de novo. Brey v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2020 WI App 45, ¶12, 393
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=345103 - 2021-03-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
A. Applicable Standards of Review and Principles of Law ¶15 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161688 - 2017-09-21
A. Applicable Standards of Review and Principles of Law ¶15 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161688 - 2017-09-21