Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15061 - 15070 of 30072 for de.
Search results 15061 - 15070 of 30072 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
briefing and their assumptions, even on our de novo review, that the circuit court properly determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242341 - 2019-06-18
briefing and their assumptions, even on our de novo review, that the circuit court properly determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242341 - 2019-06-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
standard, we review that contention de novo. Id. at 120. ¶16 Motions to modify child placement orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90737 - 2014-09-15
standard, we review that contention de novo. Id. at 120. ¶16 Motions to modify child placement orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90737 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are available is a question of law reviewed de novo. Tucker v. Marcus, 142 Wis. 2d 425, 432, 418 N.W.2d 818
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177782 - 2017-09-21
are available is a question of law reviewed de novo. Tucker v. Marcus, 142 Wis. 2d 425, 432, 418 N.W.2d 818
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177782 - 2017-09-21
State v. Michael F. Howard
review de novo. Id. at 266. ¶16 Here, the terms of the plea agreement were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2852 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. Id. at 266. ¶16 Here, the terms of the plea agreement were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2852 - 2005-03-31
2006 WI APP 201
granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. See Voss v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26596 - 2006-10-30
granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. See Voss v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26596 - 2006-10-30
Agnes E. Maciolek v. City of Milwaukee Employes' Retirement System Annuity and Pension Board
for review. II ¶10 Statutory interpretation presents an issue of law which we review de novo. While
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21184 - 2006-01-30
for review. II ¶10 Statutory interpretation presents an issue of law which we review de novo. While
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21184 - 2006-01-30
[PDF]
WI App 46
review under § 5.06, the court “may not conduct a de novo proceeding with respect to any findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832284 - 2024-09-11
review under § 5.06, the court “may not conduct a de novo proceeding with respect to any findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=832284 - 2024-09-11
Gary L. Addison v. Grant County
the Adamses, based on the facts as found by the trial court, presents a question of law, which we decided de
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11022 - 2005-03-31
the Adamses, based on the facts as found by the trial court, presents a question of law, which we decided de
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11022 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been established and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103114 - 2005-03-31
review de novo the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been established and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103114 - 2005-03-31
Kohler Company v. Sogen International Fund, Inc.
in that action is a question of law. Our review of a trial court’s decision on a question of law is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15369 - 2005-03-31
in that action is a question of law. Our review of a trial court’s decision on a question of law is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15369 - 2005-03-31