Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15071 - 15080 of 83820 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 15071 - 15080 of 83820 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Steven Warner
statement that it was unfair. We will not search the record to discover the alleged prejudice for him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7953 - 2017-09-19
statement that it was unfair. We will not search the record to discover the alleged prejudice for him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7953 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
does not explain its reason for a discretionary decision, we may search the record for reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46658 - 2014-09-15
does not explain its reason for a discretionary decision, we may search the record for reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46658 - 2014-09-15
Tina L. Lamb v. Bruce A. Lamb
search over the record to see if such findings are supported by the record. Schmid v. Olsen, 111 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3218 - 2005-03-31
search over the record to see if such findings are supported by the record. Schmid v. Olsen, 111 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3218 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Calvin Shields
States Constitution protects “[t]he rights of the people . . . against unreasonable searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15493 - 2017-09-21
States Constitution protects “[t]he rights of the people . . . against unreasonable searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15493 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dean C. Trepanier
need not search the record to determine whether the sentencing court’s original ERP eligibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26060 - 2006-07-31
need not search the record to determine whether the sentencing court’s original ERP eligibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26060 - 2006-07-31
COURT OF APPEALS
unreasonable searches and seizures. In order to make a constitutionally permissible investigative stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32178 - 2008-03-24
unreasonable searches and seizures. In order to make a constitutionally permissible investigative stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32178 - 2008-03-24
Susan P. Huycke-Sossaman v. Dean K. Sossaman
on which it relies, this court must search the record to determine if the decision is supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2910 - 2005-12-17
on which it relies, this court must search the record to determine if the decision is supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2910 - 2005-12-17
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 30, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
vehicle is a seizure, triggering Fourth Amendment protection from unreasonable search and seizure. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27927 - 2005-04-29
vehicle is a seizure, triggering Fourth Amendment protection from unreasonable search and seizure. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27927 - 2005-04-29
[PDF]
WI App 2
2025 WI App 2 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2022AP431
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=891865 - 2025-02-12
2025 WI App 2 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2022AP431
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=891865 - 2025-02-12
[PDF]
Comments on Supreme Court rule 16-01 - Ingrisano and Smies
and legal commentators, including Professor Daniel D. Blinka,1 have clearly articulated the case for repeal
/supreme/docs/1601commentingrisanosmies.pdf - 2016-10-03
and legal commentators, including Professor Daniel D. Blinka,1 have clearly articulated the case for repeal
/supreme/docs/1601commentingrisanosmies.pdf - 2016-10-03