Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15081 - 15090 of 18125 for 2011.

COURT OF APPEALS
effect on the outcome of the proceedings.’” State v. Domke, 2011 WI 95, ¶54, 337 Wis. 2d 268, 805 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77429 - 2012-01-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in their residence than in their vehicle. See State v. Ultsch, 2011 WI App 17, ¶¶11-12, 331 Wis. 2d 242, 793 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218216 - 2018-08-29

CA Blank Order
to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2011-12 version unless otherwise noted. [2] Janice might be arguing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138490 - 2015-04-15

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 29, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74375 - 2011-12-11

COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 19, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58971 - 2011-01-18

COURT OF APPEALS
to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2011-12 version unless otherwise noted. [3] The plea questionnaire indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109016 - 2014-03-17

[PDF] WI APP 75
3 Although not controlling, we find Sabatini v. Roybal, 261 P.3d 1110 (N.M. Ct. App. 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294196 - 2020-12-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
apply the clearly erroneous standard to the court’s factual findings. State v. Smiter, 2011 WI App 15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208244 - 2018-02-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 29, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74375 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review de novo. State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶16, 331 Wis. 2d 640, 794 N.W.2d 920. Newly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205013 - 2017-12-13