Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15081 - 15090 of 34724 for in n.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
State v. Goss, 2011 WI 104, ¶22 & n.19, 338 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98790 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey L. Watson
an “enthusiastic recommendation” of the plea agreement. Id. at 322 n.2, 479 N.W.2d at 243 n.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14117 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Gill.” We do not address this issue. See Roy v. St. Lukes Med. Ctr., 2007 WI App 218, ¶30 n.6, 305
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204664 - 2017-12-05

COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶8 Wisconsin Stat. § 51.61(1)(g)4. provides in relevant part: [A]n individual is not competent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136872 - 2015-03-10

COURT OF APPEALS
by assignment or delegation. Id., ¶18 n.5. The language of the easement is key. Id., ¶24. Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86915 - 2012-09-10

COURT OF APPEALS
“[n]egatives the existence of a state of mind essential to the crime.” Ultimately, Deppiesse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111764 - 2014-05-06

COURT OF APPEALS
evidence within the meaning of the law. State v. Bauer, 2000 WI App 206, ¶7 n.2, 238 Wis. 2d 687, 617 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110501 - 2014-04-22

Mary Jane Lenhardt v. William John Lenhardt
In re the marriage of: Mary Jane Lenhardt, n/k/a Mary Jane Montini, Petitioner-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21388 - 2006-02-14

[PDF] WI APP 253
does not render Basley’s motion infirm. See State v. Howell, 2006 WI App 182, ¶45 n.14, ___ Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27297 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
reflects information entered by court staff.” Kirk v. Credit Acceptance Corp., 2013 WI App 32, ¶5 n.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610563 - 2023-01-18