Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15091 - 15100 of 59254 for SMALL CLAIMS.

State v. Michael R. Caspersen
denying postconviction relief. He claims his conviction must be set aside because he was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4920 - 2005-03-31

Melissa Newkirk v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
and several of its employees, claiming they were negligent in failing to have proper signs in the area
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14640 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frederick N. Spence v. Marianne A. Cooke
judgment was inappropriate on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim and his claim that he No. 99-0283 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15080 - 2017-09-21

Guadalupe Fernandez v. Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
for such setoff unless you pay the claim within 30 days of the date of this notice or make other repayment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12948 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
for a writ of habeas corpus will not be granted where (1) the petitioner asserts a claim that he or she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33658 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Michael R. Caspersen
claims his conviction must be set aside because he was convicted of a crime “which does not exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4920 - 2017-09-19

Gregg Hagopian v. Lawrence Lind
by Gregg and Amelia Hagopian. The Linds argue that the trial court erred in determining that the claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14881 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
-14). 1 Garcia argues that postconviction counsel was ineffective in failing to raise claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166271 - 2017-09-21

Town of Kronenwetter v. City of Mosinee
appeals a summary judgment dismissing its claims against the City of Mosinee.[1] Kronenwetter raises two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9140 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
barred Beaver’s claims against the County; (2) summary judgment was inappropriate because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29416 - 2007-06-18