Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15091 - 15100 of 30137 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15091 - 15100 of 30137 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶¶7, 11, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29128 - 2007-06-26
of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶¶7, 11, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29128 - 2007-06-26
Susann M. Vander Wielen v. Ronald E. Van Asten
. Stat. ch. 704. We thus have before us only questions of law, which we decide de novo. See Kenyon v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19710 - 2005-10-27
. Stat. ch. 704. We thus have before us only questions of law, which we decide de novo. See Kenyon v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19710 - 2005-10-27
[PDF]
State v. Shelleen B. Joyner
performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4592 - 2017-09-19
performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. Id., 153 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4592 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Denis Collins v. Andrew Policano
. 227. Thus, the question before us is largely one of statutory interpretation, which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15063 - 2017-09-21
. 227. Thus, the question before us is largely one of statutory interpretation, which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15063 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Steven F. Weynand v. Lucille R. Weynand Foster
1 This is the subject of Appeal No. 99-0976. No. 99-0976 99-1607 6 de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15375 - 2017-09-21
1 This is the subject of Appeal No. 99-0976. No. 99-0976 99-1607 6 de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15375 - 2017-09-21
State v. Rodobaldo C. Pozo
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. Pozo argues that Pappenfuss engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10656 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. Pozo argues that Pappenfuss engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10656 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a circuit court’s summary judgment decision is de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535327 - 2022-06-22
of a circuit court’s summary judgment decision is de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535327 - 2022-06-22
[PDF]
WI APP 187
, however. Motions to dismiss and for summary judgment both are subject to our de novo review. State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26280 - 2014-09-15
, however. Motions to dismiss and for summary judgment both are subject to our de novo review. State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26280 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 134
124 (1996) (statutory interpretation presents a question of law this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38860 - 2014-09-15
124 (1996) (statutory interpretation presents a question of law this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38860 - 2014-09-15
Leslie J. Schatz v. Gary R. McCaughtry
. § 802.05(3), which presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3756 - 2005-03-31
. § 802.05(3), which presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3756 - 2005-03-31