Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15091 - 15100 of 29484 for name.
Search results 15091 - 15100 of 29484 for name.
COURT OF APPEALS
in postconviction proceedings pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.30(2)(h) (2003-04), namely the trial court’s error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33898 - 2008-09-02
in postconviction proceedings pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.30(2)(h) (2003-04), namely the trial court’s error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33898 - 2008-09-02
State v. Walter Lee Thomas
from amounting to prejudice under Strickland. 5. Counsel’s failure to object to a witness whose name
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11162 - 2005-03-31
from amounting to prejudice under Strickland. 5. Counsel’s failure to object to a witness whose name
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11162 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
name. Due to the sensitive nature of this matter, we also use pseudonyms to refer to the victim’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217698 - 2018-08-21
name. Due to the sensitive nature of this matter, we also use pseudonyms to refer to the victim’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217698 - 2018-08-21
[PDF]
State v. Arminius D. Jones
named Charles Dickerson. Jones was unhappy with Dickerson because of a dispute concerning a concert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5022 - 2017-09-19
named Charles Dickerson. Jones was unhappy with Dickerson because of a dispute concerning a concert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5022 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court, where the court had not immediately recognized Gaines’s name as being the victim in Lamar’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195558 - 2017-09-21
court, where the court had not immediately recognized Gaines’s name as being the victim in Lamar’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195558 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
will discuss two issues raised by Anderson in his response. Namely, whether his trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161511 - 2017-09-21
will discuss two issues raised by Anderson in his response. Namely, whether his trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161511 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the entity Michels made a deal with, namely Sooner. In making this argument, Haub mistakenly takes what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86551 - 2012-08-29
the entity Michels made a deal with, namely Sooner. In making this argument, Haub mistakenly takes what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86551 - 2012-08-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that do not conform to her actual name. Nos. 2023AP2393-CR 2023AP2394-CR 3 A.B. called
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996551 - 2025-08-14
that do not conform to her actual name. Nos. 2023AP2393-CR 2023AP2394-CR 3 A.B. called
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996551 - 2025-08-14
State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
Appeal from a judgment and orders Full Name JUDGE COURT: Circuit Lower Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8317 - 2005-03-31
Appeal from a judgment and orders Full Name JUDGE COURT: Circuit Lower Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8317 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
earlier, namely that he lost his temper as a result of the victim’s relationship with another man
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116805 - 2014-07-08
earlier, namely that he lost his temper as a result of the victim’s relationship with another man
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116805 - 2014-07-08