Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1511 - 1520 of 83184 for case code.
Search results 1511 - 1520 of 83184 for case code.
[PDF]
WI APP 88
2010 WI APP 88 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP608
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51344 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 88 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP608
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51344 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
COUNTY CODE ch. 24 is not ripe for adjudication; WIS. STAT. § 66.0401(1) requires a case-by-case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35714 - 2014-09-15
COUNTY CODE ch. 24 is not ripe for adjudication; WIS. STAT. § 66.0401(1) requires a case-by-case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35714 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
., Ordinance 2011-19, § 1 (Nov. 14, 2011) (the Ordinance). Whereas the Village Code of Ordinances (the Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139848 - 2015-04-13
., Ordinance 2011-19, § 1 (Nov. 14, 2011) (the Ordinance). Whereas the Village Code of Ordinances (the Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139848 - 2015-04-13
County of Walworth v. James E. O'Donnell
of § 343.10(10)(d), Stats., 1993-94,[1] and Wis. Adm. Code § Trans 112.05(3)(b). Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12350 - 2005-03-31
of § 343.10(10)(d), Stats., 1993-94,[1] and Wis. Adm. Code § Trans 112.05(3)(b). Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12350 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Walworth v. James E. O'Donnell
of § 343.10(10)(d), STATS., 1993-94,1 and WIS. ADM. CODE § TRANS 112.05(3)(b). Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12350 - 2017-09-21
of § 343.10(10)(d), STATS., 1993-94,1 and WIS. ADM. CODE § TRANS 112.05(3)(b). Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12350 - 2017-09-21
State v. Eric D. Gillespie
2005 WI App 35 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 04-1758-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7581 - 2005-05-09
2005 WI App 35 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 04-1758-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7581 - 2005-05-09
[PDF]
William N. Ledford v. William Noland
was denied by the “appropriate reviewing authority.” See WIS. ADM. CODE § DOC 310.12. Ledford sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15683 - 2017-09-21
was denied by the “appropriate reviewing authority.” See WIS. ADM. CODE § DOC 310.12. Ledford sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15683 - 2017-09-21
William N. Ledford v. William Noland
. Code § DOC 310.12. Ledford sought the next level of review, which is the corrections complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15683 - 2005-03-31
. Code § DOC 310.12. Ledford sought the next level of review, which is the corrections complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15683 - 2005-03-31
Debra A. Maki v. Kathleen W. Allen
” for making a good faith complaint about the premises to a local housing code enforcement agency. The main
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4715 - 2012-06-25
” for making a good faith complaint about the premises to a local housing code enforcement agency. The main
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4715 - 2012-06-25
David A. Schlemm v. Matthew Frank
). However, in that case the court’s focus was on the release of an exculpatory statement. Schlemm does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19277 - 2005-08-10
). However, in that case the court’s focus was on the release of an exculpatory statement. Schlemm does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19277 - 2005-08-10