Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1511 - 1520 of 83803 for case code.
Search results 1511 - 1520 of 83803 for case code.
State v. Erica S.
BROWN, P.J.[1] The issue in this case is whether a time deadline of reasonableness should be read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2884 - 2005-03-31
BROWN, P.J.[1] The issue in this case is whether a time deadline of reasonableness should be read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2884 - 2005-03-31
Wisconsin Court System - Court services - For interpreters - Resources
justices Calendar Livestream courts Famous cases Visiting Court of Appeals Function Fees & filing Judges
/services/interpreter/res/glossaries.htm - 2026-06-29
justices Calendar Livestream courts Famous cases Visiting Court of Appeals Function Fees & filing Judges
/services/interpreter/res/glossaries.htm - 2026-06-29
Wisconsin Court System - Court services - For interpreters - Council of Language Access Coordinators
justices Calendar Livestream courts Famous cases Visiting Court of Appeals Function Fees & filing Judges
/services/interpreter/consortium.htm - 2026-06-29
justices Calendar Livestream courts Famous cases Visiting Court of Appeals Function Fees & filing Judges
/services/interpreter/consortium.htm - 2026-06-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to time 1 This case provides an excellent opportunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65391 - 2014-09-15
to time 1 This case provides an excellent opportunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65391 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the condemnation process pursuant to Wis. Admin. Code § PSC 113.0509 (Apr. 2007). The circuit court granted ATC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65391 - 2011-06-06
the condemnation process pursuant to Wis. Admin. Code § PSC 113.0509 (Apr. 2007). The circuit court granted ATC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65391 - 2011-06-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184104 - 2017-09-21
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184104 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
COUNTY CODE ch. 24 is not ripe for adjudication; WIS. STAT. § 66.0401(1) requires a case-by-case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35714 - 2014-09-15
COUNTY CODE ch. 24 is not ripe for adjudication; WIS. STAT. § 66.0401(1) requires a case-by-case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35714 - 2014-09-15
Michael Baxter v. William Lynch
double damages under Wis. Stat. § 100.20(5) (2003-04),[1] caused by Lynch’s violation of Wis. Admin. Code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24912 - 2006-05-02
double damages under Wis. Stat. § 100.20(5) (2003-04),[1] caused by Lynch’s violation of Wis. Admin. Code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24912 - 2006-05-02
COURT OF APPEALS
., Ordinance 2011-19, § 1 (Nov. 14, 2011) (the Ordinance). Whereas the Village Code of Ordinances (the Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139848 - 2015-04-13
., Ordinance 2011-19, § 1 (Nov. 14, 2011) (the Ordinance). Whereas the Village Code of Ordinances (the Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139848 - 2015-04-13
[PDF]
Supreme Court open rules petition conference agenda - June 25, 2014
60.04 (Judicial Code amendment regarding communication with pro se litigants), February 24, 2014 public
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oac062514.pdf - 2014-06-17
60.04 (Judicial Code amendment regarding communication with pro se litigants), February 24, 2014 public
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oac062514.pdf - 2014-06-17