Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1511 - 1520 of 30177 for de.
Search results 1511 - 1520 of 30177 for de.
Carla Randecker v. Frances C. Lindsey
judgments of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2194 - 2005-03-31
judgments of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2194 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
96 CV 1749 William A. Pangman v. Richard William King
Martin Luther King Blvd. Madison, WI 53703 Hon. Robert De Chambeau Trial Court Judge City
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14076 - 2014-09-15
Martin Luther King Blvd. Madison, WI 53703 Hon. Robert De Chambeau Trial Court Judge City
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14076 - 2014-09-15
Siu Wing Leung v. City of Lake Geneva
interpretation, our standard of review is de novo. State v. Isaac J.R., 220 Wis. 2d 251, 255, 582 N.W.2d 476 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5771 - 2005-03-31
interpretation, our standard of review is de novo. State v. Isaac J.R., 220 Wis. 2d 251, 255, 582 N.W.2d 476 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5771 - 2005-03-31
James Cape & Sons Co. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
for such costs. ¶7 We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7443 - 2005-03-31
for such costs. ¶7 We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7443 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Randy R. Mertz
to a statute, thereby presenting a question of law to be reviewed de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8617 - 2017-09-19
to a statute, thereby presenting a question of law to be reviewed de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8617 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The City of Kenosha then appealed that ruling to the circuit court. ¶5 Following a de novo refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55133 - 2014-09-15
. The City of Kenosha then appealed that ruling to the circuit court. ¶5 Following a de novo refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55133 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for de novo review. See WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8). An initial de novo review hearing was held on November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980295 - 2025-07-08
for de novo review. See WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8). An initial de novo review hearing was held on November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980295 - 2025-07-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Olson appeals. We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141254 - 2017-09-21
. Olson appeals. We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141254 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
James Cape & Sons Co. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
the DOT’s liability for such costs. ¶7 We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7443 - 2017-09-20
the DOT’s liability for such costs. ¶7 We review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7443 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to do so. Analysis ¶3 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159268 - 2017-09-21
to do so. Analysis ¶3 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159268 - 2017-09-21