Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1511 - 1520 of 29823 for des.
Search results 1511 - 1520 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2018AP337 2 ¶1 SEIDL, J.1 James Gauthier, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237937 - 2019-03-26
A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2018AP337 2 ¶1 SEIDL, J.1 James Gauthier, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237937 - 2019-03-26
State v. Thomas J. Wilde
] The constitutionality of an ordinance is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Wilke v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4830 - 2005-03-31
] The constitutionality of an ordinance is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See Wilke v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4830 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for de novo review. See WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8). An initial de novo review hearing was held on November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980295 - 2025-07-08
for de novo review. See WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8). An initial de novo review hearing was held on November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980295 - 2025-07-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶7 We apply a de novo standard of review to questions of statutory interpretation. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86474 - 2014-09-15
). ¶7 We apply a de novo standard of review to questions of statutory interpretation. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86474 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 31, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
the motion and Matuszek was convicted. ¶3 We review de novo questions of statutory construction when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27979 - 2007-01-30
the motion and Matuszek was convicted. ¶3 We review de novo questions of statutory construction when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27979 - 2007-01-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for de novo review. See WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8). An initial de novo review hearing was held on November
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980295 - 2025-07-08
for de novo review. See WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8). An initial de novo review hearing was held on November
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980295 - 2025-07-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to do so. Analysis ¶3 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159268 - 2017-09-21
to do so. Analysis ¶3 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159268 - 2017-09-21
Karen T. Runge v. Allstate Insurance Company
. We review decisions on summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10126 - 2005-03-31
. We review decisions on summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10126 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
divisible or nondivisible is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. The burden of showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85990 - 2014-09-15
divisible or nondivisible is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. The burden of showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85990 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
which we review de novo. State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571-572, 570 N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33255 - 2014-09-15
which we review de novo. State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571-572, 570 N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33255 - 2014-09-15