Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15101 - 15110 of 64735 for b's.
Search results 15101 - 15110 of 64735 for b's.
State v. John D. Tiggs, Jr.
it that the defendant in fact committed the crime charged.” Wis. Stat. § 971.08(1)(b). However, Tiggs’ argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24816 - 2006-04-12
it that the defendant in fact committed the crime charged.” Wis. Stat. § 971.08(1)(b). However, Tiggs’ argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24816 - 2006-04-12
Xiaoxia Yu v. Jiayou Zhang
of the circuit court for Dane County: Angela B. Bartell, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, Roggensack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11209 - 2005-03-31
of the circuit court for Dane County: Angela B. Bartell, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, Roggensack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11209 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)(4). [1] This appeal is decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50828 - 2010-06-09
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)(4). [1] This appeal is decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50828 - 2010-06-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
court for Milwaukee County: MICHAEL B. BRENNAN, Judge. Affirmed. Before Higginbotham, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35365 - 2014-09-15
court for Milwaukee County: MICHAEL B. BRENNAN, Judge. Affirmed. Before Higginbotham, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35365 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jerald J. McDowell
substance with intent to deliver, as a subsequent offense, contrary to §§ 161.16(2)(b)1, 161.41(1m)(cm)1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10604 - 2017-09-20
substance with intent to deliver, as a subsequent offense, contrary to §§ 161.16(2)(b)1, 161.41(1m)(cm)1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10604 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
there 1 The Roops’ reply brief fails to conform to the rules contained in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(8)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178522 - 2017-09-21
there 1 The Roops’ reply brief fails to conform to the rules contained in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(8)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=178522 - 2017-09-21
City of Menomonie v. Jeno D. Herman
vehicle with a prohibited alcohol concentration, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 346.63(1)(a) and 346.63(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4189 - 2005-03-31
vehicle with a prohibited alcohol concentration, contrary to Wis. Stat. §§ 346.63(1)(a) and 346.63(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4189 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
with a prohibited alcohol concentration, § 346.63(1)(b). ¶5 At trial, the arresting officer testified about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91641 - 2013-01-15
with a prohibited alcohol concentration, § 346.63(1)(b). ¶5 At trial, the arresting officer testified about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91641 - 2013-01-15
State v. James W. Knipfer
statements are not hearsay. See Wis. Stat. § 908.01(4)(b)1. Although testimony about Geraldine’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25261 - 2006-05-24
statements are not hearsay. See Wis. Stat. § 908.01(4)(b)1. Although testimony about Geraldine’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25261 - 2006-05-24
Waushara County v. Clinton L. Duhm
to Wis. Stat. § 345.51 is that found in Wis. Stat. § 345.37(1)(b), whether the defendant “shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4530 - 2005-03-31
to Wis. Stat. § 345.51 is that found in Wis. Stat. § 345.37(1)(b), whether the defendant “shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4530 - 2005-03-31