Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15121 - 15130 of 97621 for court records search online.
Search results 15121 - 15130 of 97621 for court records search online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of Orton’s testimony and the record, so as to lead the court to accept Orton’s assertion that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149526 - 2017-09-21
of Orton’s testimony and the record, so as to lead the court to accept Orton’s assertion that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149526 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not ask to make a new record in support of that recommendation, nor did it ask the court to disregard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=269016 - 2020-07-14
not ask to make a new record in support of that recommendation, nor did it ask the court to disregard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=269016 - 2020-07-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 13, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366749 - 2021-05-13
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 13, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366749 - 2021-05-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
can determine as a matter of law based on the record before us that the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115323 - 2017-09-21
can determine as a matter of law based on the record before us that the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115323 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 11, 2025 Samuel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913146 - 2025-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 11, 2025 Samuel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913146 - 2025-02-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The circuit court initially denied the District’s motion because, in its view, the record contained issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929720 - 2025-03-19
The circuit court initially denied the District’s motion because, in its view, the record contained issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=929720 - 2025-03-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, is not to weigh the facts but to consider whether the record supports the circuit court’s exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219082 - 2019-01-29
, is not to weigh the facts but to consider whether the record supports the circuit court’s exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219082 - 2019-01-29
[PDF]
Gary Foat v. The Torrington Company
of the record, it is clear the court realized its role as a fact finder. Here, as in Sentry and unlike
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10469 - 2017-09-20
of the record, it is clear the court realized its role as a fact finder. Here, as in Sentry and unlike
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10469 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Shawnetta M. J.
and spoke with the attorneys off the record. When the circuit court went back on the record, it explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26271 - 2017-09-21
and spoke with the attorneys off the record. When the circuit court went back on the record, it explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26271 - 2017-09-21
State v. Shawnetta M. J.
with the children by telephone. The circuit court called a recess and spoke with the attorneys off the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26271 - 2006-08-20
with the children by telephone. The circuit court called a recess and spoke with the attorneys off the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26271 - 2006-08-20