Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15121 - 15130 of 24594 for extending.
Search results 15121 - 15130 of 24594 for extending.
State v. Sheila K. LaFortune
months’ initial confinement and six years’ extended supervision. LaFortune appeals. Discussion ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6999 - 2005-03-31
months’ initial confinement and six years’ extended supervision. LaFortune appeals. Discussion ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6999 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was concurrently sentenced on each to six years of initial confinement followed by ten years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378950 - 2021-06-23
was concurrently sentenced on each to six years of initial confinement followed by ten years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378950 - 2021-06-23
[PDF]
Thomson Realty of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Gerald J. Joyce
, he noted that the disputed strip extended beyond the area it would have been confined to if it had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8953 - 2017-09-19
, he noted that the disputed strip extended beyond the area it would have been confined to if it had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8953 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Town of Hallie v. City of Eau Claire
the remaining three. ¶8 When the legislature grants the power to extend boundaries to a municipal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2560 - 2017-09-19
the remaining three. ¶8 When the legislature grants the power to extend boundaries to a municipal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2560 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
that the requestors lacked standing as a result of the DNR erroneously extending by thirty days the time for public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50672 - 2010-06-07
that the requestors lacked standing as a result of the DNR erroneously extending by thirty days the time for public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50672 - 2010-06-07
COURT OF APPEALS
years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision.[1] ¶3 No direct appeal was filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93708 - 2013-03-04
years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended supervision.[1] ¶3 No direct appeal was filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93708 - 2013-03-04
[PDF]
Stephen Manley v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund
' attorney, the parties stipulated to an amendment to the scheduling order, which extended the deadlines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10383 - 2017-09-20
' attorney, the parties stipulated to an amendment to the scheduling order, which extended the deadlines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10383 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, comprised of two one- and two-year respective concurrent periods of confinement and extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28837 - 2007-06-26
, comprised of two one- and two-year respective concurrent periods of confinement and extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28837 - 2007-06-26
COURT OF APPEALS
is extended for 120 days in cases involving claims under Wis. Stat. § 893.80, Colby v. Columbia County, 202
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103690 - 2013-11-04
is extended for 120 days in cases involving claims under Wis. Stat. § 893.80, Colby v. Columbia County, 202
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103690 - 2013-11-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and twenty years of extended supervision. His appellate counsel filed a no- merit appeal, and we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255335 - 2020-02-24
confinement and twenty years of extended supervision. His appellate counsel filed a no- merit appeal, and we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255335 - 2020-02-24