Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15121 - 15130 of 59373 for quit claim deed.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
for failing to call the victim’s sister to testify, claiming her testimony would have undermined
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256778 - 2020-03-25

[PDF] State v. Joseph Allen Hopkins
, that the victim claims. The court shall give the defendant the opportunity to stipulate to the restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7785 - 2017-09-19

John A. Austin, M.D. v. Mercy Health System Corporation
their promissory estoppel claim because genuine issues of material fact exist with respect to whether the Hospital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8235 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Alexander Olson v. Wesley Olson
and this litigation ensued. ¶4 Wesley and Eleanor claimed that the option was invalid under the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2867 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Carol J. Salsbury v. Michael R. Miller
interest took priority over Salsbury’s damage claims. Salsbury appeals the summary judgment awarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12687 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
cunnilingus on her and had penis-to-vagina intercourse with her while on her couch. Chinyere M. claimed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103235 - 2017-09-21

State v. Leon J. Lace
as Tamitha King, came around the corner of the house, told Kakanis that the package was hers, and claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19446 - 2005-08-29

COURT OF APPEALS
deposition, Brophy claimed he told Daniel Mei that he recalled being served while getting into his truck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45529 - 2010-01-11

Alma Bicknese, M.D. v. Thomas B. Sutula
dismissing her claims against Thomas Sutula for promissory estoppel and intentional misrepresentation. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2775 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
judgment dismissal on immunity grounds of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 small claims action against Peter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52432 - 2010-07-21