Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15121 - 15130 of 81919 for simple case.

State v. Harris D. Byers
that (1) the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to take a plea in a ch. 980 case; (2) if the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2273 - 2005-03-31

09AP1091 Parkland Plaza Veterinary Clinic v. Anne Gerard
determined that the appeal was frivolous and remanded the case with directions to the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44371 - 2009-12-10

[PDF] WI APP 144
2009 WI APP 144 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2008AP1517
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40584 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
WI 100, ¶37, 378 Wis. 2d 431, 904 N.W.2d 93. “The factual circumstances of the case and trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=397014 - 2021-07-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the circumstances of the case. See Kimbrough, 246 Wis. 2d 648, ¶35. ¶9 To show prejudice, the complaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144662 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Harold W. Zastrow
, 389 N.W.2d 12, 19 (1986). This means that in Zastrow’s case, No. 99-1525 3 we can look
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15628 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 68
2011 WI APP 68 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2010AP1426
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63069 - 2014-09-15

State v. Andre L. Avery
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2873-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11530 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
challenged acts or omissions were objectively unreasonable under all the circumstances of the case. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144662 - 2015-07-21

State v. Paul L. Polak
2002 WI App 120 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-1873-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4172 - 2005-03-31