Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15131 - 15140 of 30705 for WA 0821 1305 0400 Penyedia XRF Gun To Test Gold Murah Kerinci Jambi [[Tigapillar]].
Search results 15131 - 15140 of 30705 for WA 0821 1305 0400 Penyedia XRF Gun To Test Gold Murah Kerinci Jambi [[Tigapillar]].
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of intoxicants on Backman’s breath and observed that Backman’s eyes were “red.” During field sobriety tests
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210424 - 2018-04-03
of intoxicants on Backman’s breath and observed that Backman’s eyes were “red.” During field sobriety tests
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210424 - 2018-04-03
City of Menomonie v. Jonathan Skibbe
on his observations, Bammert administered a number of field sobriety tests as well as a preliminary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15773 - 2005-03-31
on his observations, Bammert administered a number of field sobriety tests as well as a preliminary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15773 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
foreseeability test, formulated as “whether an objective observer could foresee that the officer’s conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27317 - 2014-09-15
foreseeability test, formulated as “whether an objective observer could foresee that the officer’s conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27317 - 2014-09-15
State v. Randy J. Smith
administered tests to Smith and found him to be of low average intelligence and not mentally retarded. Based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16267 - 2005-03-31
administered tests to Smith and found him to be of low average intelligence and not mentally retarded. Based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16267 - 2005-03-31
State v. Courtney J.R.
evidence met the two-pronged test for admission, we affirm. Additionally, because the defendant failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12514 - 2005-03-31
evidence met the two-pronged test for admission, we affirm. Additionally, because the defendant failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12514 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
below. Discussion ¶8 Reasonable suspicion is a common sense test based on the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43881 - 2014-09-15
below. Discussion ¶8 Reasonable suspicion is a common sense test based on the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43881 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jonathon L. McIntosh
of the substantial factor test in the jury instructions. Nevertheless, he claims on appeal that because the jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9229 - 2017-09-19
of the substantial factor test in the jury instructions. Nevertheless, he claims on appeal that because the jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9229 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael W. Jones
Department Vice Control Division who tested the contents of the baggy for cocaine in his presence. Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10603 - 2017-09-20
Department Vice Control Division who tested the contents of the baggy for cocaine in his presence. Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10603 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Randy J. Smith
Underwager did not base his opinion on his personal examination of Smith. He administered tests to Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16267 - 2017-09-21
Underwager did not base his opinion on his personal examination of Smith. He administered tests to Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16267 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). The evidentiary test on certiorari review is the substantial evidence test, under which we determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131864 - 2017-09-21
). The evidentiary test on certiorari review is the substantial evidence test, under which we determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131864 - 2017-09-21