Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15131 - 15140 of 29751 for des.

[PDF] Christina Bellon v. Ripon College
is de novo. Gross v. Woodman’s Food Mkt., Inc., 2002 WI App 295, ¶30, 259 Wis. 2d 181, 655 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7330 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is reviewed de novo.” Id. (citations omitted). Under the first prong of the test, we review whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195105 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
an evidentiary hearing. MacKay appeals. ¶7 We consider de novo whether a postconviction motion on its face
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89102 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. John E. Taylor
is a legal conclusion, not a finding of fact, and thus our review is de No. 98-0417-CR 5 novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13626 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Ronald Berry v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
of law de novo when the case is one of first impression. Kelley Co. v. Marquardt, 172 Wis.2d 234, 245
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12014 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. [State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31308 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Arturo Melendez
, the question, as here, is one of law to be reviewed de novo. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis.2d 273, 277, 533
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12133 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
principles to those facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo.” State v. Drew, 2007 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36845 - 2009-06-17

Town of Mount Pleasant v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company
.2d 142 (citations omitted). Summary judgment presents a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2287 - 2005-03-31

H&H Assad, LLC v. City of Milwaukee
On April 5, 2002, Assad returned to circuit court with a motion for a de novo hearing, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6085 - 2005-03-31