Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15141 - 15150 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] Allan Hoffmann v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
¶15 Whether the evidence warrants submitting a matter to the jury is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3112 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of law that this court reviews de novo.” Id. (emphasis added). The PRB’s findings will be upheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801768 - 2024-05-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. This contention is based on the premise that the hearing officer’s interview of Sergeant Immel constituted a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30885 - 2007-11-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” See id. No. 2020AP583-CR 5 ¶13 A defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=388506 - 2021-07-13

Progressive Northern Insurance Company v. Edward Hall
the exercise of such discretion turns upon a question of law, we review the question de novo, benefiting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7374 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
“reviewed all the records for this account” and “ma[de] this Affidavit based upon personal knowledge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94377 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Thong L. Soun
then independently apply the law to those facts de novo.” State v. Hughes, 2000 WI 24, ¶15, 233 Wis. 2d 280, 607
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21078 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
determination of whether counsel’s assistance was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106016 - 2013-12-19

COURT OF APPEALS
,’ and the application of these historical facts to constitutional principles, which we review de novo.” Id. (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41625 - 2009-09-28

COURT OF APPEALS
. 668, 687 (1984). We uphold a trial court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous, but decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142860 - 2015-06-09