Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15141 - 15150 of 70363 for his.
Search results 15141 - 15150 of 70363 for his.
[PDF]
State v. Spriggie Hensley, Jr.
dismissing his § 974.06, STATS., motion for postconviction relief. In State v. No. 97-3052 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13158 - 2017-09-21
dismissing his § 974.06, STATS., motion for postconviction relief. In State v. No. 97-3052 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13158 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
court orders denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2005–06)[2] postconviction motion and his reconsideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33275 - 2008-07-07
court orders denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2005–06)[2] postconviction motion and his reconsideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33275 - 2008-07-07
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Korotka
, and failure to stop and render aid, causing death. Korotka appeals and the sole issue is whether his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15589 - 2017-09-21
, and failure to stop and render aid, causing death. Korotka appeals and the sole issue is whether his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15589 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeffrey Turner
of second-degree sexual assault and bail jumping. He also appeals an order denying his motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5777 - 2005-03-31
of second-degree sexual assault and bail jumping. He also appeals an order denying his motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5777 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenneth Korotka
appeals and the sole issue is whether his written statement to a sheriff’s detective should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15589 - 2005-03-31
appeals and the sole issue is whether his written statement to a sheriff’s detective should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15589 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
failed to stop the interrogation after he invoked his right to remain silent. We agree. We remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47401 - 2014-09-15
failed to stop the interrogation after he invoked his right to remain silent. We agree. We remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47401 - 2014-09-15
State v. Robert O. Schmidt
an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (1999-2000)[1] motion. We affirm. ¶2 Schmidt was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4135 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (1999-2000)[1] motion. We affirm. ¶2 Schmidt was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4135 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
a motion to modify his sentence can be made.” State v. Mosley, No. 2006AP1269, unpublished slip op. at 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33843 - 2014-09-15
a motion to modify his sentence can be made.” State v. Mosley, No. 2006AP1269, unpublished slip op. at 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33843 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Postconviction, he challenged his sentence on two bases: the sentence was harsh and unconscionable and a new
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190154 - 2017-09-21
. Postconviction, he challenged his sentence on two bases: the sentence was harsh and unconscionable and a new
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190154 - 2017-09-21
State v. Buren F. Sprague
or revocations did not contribute to his conviction for OMVWI in violation of § 346.63(1)(a), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13277 - 2005-03-31
or revocations did not contribute to his conviction for OMVWI in violation of § 346.63(1)(a), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13277 - 2005-03-31