Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15151 - 15160 of 62336 for child support.
Search results 15151 - 15160 of 62336 for child support.
State v. Edward A. Hammer
. ¶2 The circuit court convicted Hammer of second-degree sexual assault of a child under Wis. Stat
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17441 - 2005-03-31
. ¶2 The circuit court convicted Hammer of second-degree sexual assault of a child under Wis. Stat
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17441 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - October 2017
that a defendant entering a guilty plea to child enticement with intent to have sexual contact understands
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197154 - 2017-09-26
that a defendant entering a guilty plea to child enticement with intent to have sexual contact understands
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197154 - 2017-09-26
[PDF]
State v. Edward A. Hammer
of second-degree sexual assault of a child under Wis. Stat. § 948.02(2) (1995- 96), 1 and fourth-degree
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17441 - 2017-09-21
of second-degree sexual assault of a child under Wis. Stat. § 948.02(2) (1995- 96), 1 and fourth-degree
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17441 - 2017-09-21
WI App 113 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP1903-CR Complete Titl...
that Schmidt could not present any evidence in support of an adequate provocation mitigation defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86699 - 2012-10-30
that Schmidt could not present any evidence in support of an adequate provocation mitigation defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86699 - 2012-10-30
[PDF]
WI APP 113
when the trial court ruled before trial that Schmidt could not present any evidence in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86699 - 2014-09-15
when the trial court ruled before trial that Schmidt could not present any evidence in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86699 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
October 29, 2012
be upheld “only if there was sufficient evidence to support guilt on the charge submitted to the jury
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88838 - 2014-09-15
be upheld “only if there was sufficient evidence to support guilt on the charge submitted to the jury
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88838 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State of the Judiciary Address 2005
courtrooms are accessible so that no Wisconsin resident faces losing custody of his or her child, or losing
/publications/speeches/docs/judaddress05.pdf - 2009-11-19
courtrooms are accessible so that no Wisconsin resident faces losing custody of his or her child, or losing
/publications/speeches/docs/judaddress05.pdf - 2009-11-19
[PDF]
WI APP 111
to a child. A guardian ad litem and parents of the victim (collectively, the Ladewigs) brought the action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66067 - 2014-09-15
to a child. A guardian ad litem and parents of the victim (collectively, the Ladewigs) brought the action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66067 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
intentional homicide, first-degree sexual assault, and first-degree sexual assault of a child under age
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=847995 - 2024-09-10
intentional homicide, first-degree sexual assault, and first-degree sexual assault of a child under age
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=847995 - 2024-09-10
State v. James D. Miller
by a therapist contrary to Wis. Stat. § 940.22(2) (1999-2000),[1] and first-degree sexual assault of a child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4001 - 2005-03-31
by a therapist contrary to Wis. Stat. § 940.22(2) (1999-2000),[1] and first-degree sexual assault of a child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4001 - 2005-03-31