Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15151 - 15160 of 30066 for de.
Search results 15151 - 15160 of 30066 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the evidence de novo, but in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction. State v. Hanson, 2012 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162500 - 2017-09-21
of the evidence de novo, but in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction. State v. Hanson, 2012 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162500 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2023AP1038 5 conclusions of law,” however, and reviews legal issues de novo. City of Muskego v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737449 - 2023-12-06
No. 2023AP1038 5 conclusions of law,” however, and reviews legal issues de novo. City of Muskego v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737449 - 2023-12-06
COURT OF APPEALS
(1999). Our review is de novo, State v. Tiepelman, 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d 179, 717 N.W.2d 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132114 - 2014-12-22
(1999). Our review is de novo, State v. Tiepelman, 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d 179, 717 N.W.2d 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132114 - 2014-12-22
Lorraine K. Kerbell (now Ruth) v. Robert A. Kerbell
questions of law de novo. Ball v. District No. 4 Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537, 345 N.W.2d 389, 394 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11453 - 2005-03-31
questions of law de novo. Ball v. District No. 4 Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537, 345 N.W.2d 389, 394 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11453 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which [appellate courts] review de novo.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250461 - 2019-11-21
for ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which [appellate courts] review de novo.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250461 - 2019-11-21
[PDF]
Randall G. Bobholz v. John Banaszak
commissioner ruled in favor of Bobholz for $4220. Banaszak requested a trial de novo. Following a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5235 - 2017-09-19
commissioner ruled in favor of Bobholz for $4220. Banaszak requested a trial de novo. Following a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5235 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
as a result of the juror’s inattentiveness is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶48. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137502 - 2015-03-16
as a result of the juror’s inattentiveness is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶48. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137502 - 2015-03-16
County of Dane v. Jeffrey J. Mawhinney
the established facts constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3675 - 2005-03-31
the established facts constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3675 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. This requires us to interpret and apply WIS. STAT. § 101.11, presenting a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37948 - 2014-09-15
. This requires us to interpret and apply WIS. STAT. § 101.11, presenting a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37948 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Mareese Anderson
609, 611 (1989). Whether a “new factor” exists is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11809 - 2017-09-21
609, 611 (1989). Whether a “new factor” exists is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11809 - 2017-09-21