Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15151 - 15160 of 29751 for des.
Search results 15151 - 15160 of 29751 for des.
State v. Peter D. Grefsheim
., and are subject to our de novo review. See Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis.2d 973, 979, 543 N.W.2d 148
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14954 - 2005-03-31
., and are subject to our de novo review. See Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 197 Wis.2d 973, 979, 543 N.W.2d 148
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14954 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a hearing on the motion, the circuit court granted it. Roehl appeals. ΒΆ6 We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247669 - 2019-10-02
a hearing on the motion, the circuit court granted it. Roehl appeals. ΒΆ6 We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247669 - 2019-10-02
Mid-State Contracting, Inc. v. Superior Floor Company, Inc.
Whether to allow interest on a verdict is a question of law that we review de novo. See Weber v. CNW
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5060 - 2005-03-31
Whether to allow interest on a verdict is a question of law that we review de novo. See Weber v. CNW
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5060 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kemmick D. Holmes
reviews de novo. See State v. Anderson, 219 Wis. 2d 739, 746, 580 N.W.2d 329, 332 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15633 - 2005-03-31
reviews de novo. See State v. Anderson, 219 Wis. 2d 739, 746, 580 N.W.2d 329, 332 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15633 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William E. Hall
the application of constitutional standards to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2627 - 2017-09-19
the application of constitutional standards to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2627 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Alan W. Gursky
, 556 N.W.2d 681, 683 (1996), and its conclusions of law are subject to de novo review, id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13214 - 2017-09-21
, 556 N.W.2d 681, 683 (1996), and its conclusions of law are subject to de novo review, id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13214 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Lorraine K. Kerbell (now Ruth) v. Robert A. Kerbell
.2d 733, 737 (1968). We review questions of law de novo. Ball v. District No. 4 Area Bd., 117
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11453 - 2017-09-19
.2d 733, 737 (1968). We review questions of law de novo. Ball v. District No. 4 Area Bd., 117
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11453 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
John Smith v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14702 - 2017-09-21
be accorded great weight deference, due weight deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14702 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
concerns a question of law, such as the interpretation of an insurance policy, appellate review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987239 - 2025-07-23
concerns a question of law, such as the interpretation of an insurance policy, appellate review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987239 - 2025-07-23
[PDF]
Susan A. Riemer v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Company
is also de novo, and we apply the same standards and methods as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4886 - 2017-09-19
is also de novo, and we apply the same standards and methods as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4886 - 2017-09-19