Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15161 - 15170 of 30066 for de.
Search results 15161 - 15170 of 30066 for de.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of counsel’s effectiveness, in contrast, is a question of law, which is reviewed de novo. Kimbrough, 246
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192221 - 2017-09-21
of counsel’s effectiveness, in contrast, is a question of law, which is reviewed de novo. Kimbrough, 246
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192221 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Thames, 2005 WI App 101, ¶10, 281 Wis. 2d 772, 700 N.W.2d 285
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040799 - 2025-11-25
that this court reviews de novo. State v. Thames, 2005 WI App 101, ¶10, 281 Wis. 2d 772, 700 N.W.2d 285
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040799 - 2025-11-25
State v. Raul M. Cordova
). If the finding is one of constitutional fact, we will review it de novo. See id. Thus, we owe no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14185 - 2005-03-31
). If the finding is one of constitutional fact, we will review it de novo. See id. Thus, we owe no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14185 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and prejudicial presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120636 - 2014-09-15
was deficient and prejudicial presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120636 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Debra J. Wall v. Michael K. Wall
exercised its discretion is a question of law which we review de novo. See Seep v. State Personnel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12252 - 2017-09-21
exercised its discretion is a question of law which we review de novo. See Seep v. State Personnel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12252 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
violates a defendant’s constitutional right is a question of law [that] this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48904 - 2014-09-15
violates a defendant’s constitutional right is a question of law [that] this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48904 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant received constitutionally ineffective assistance de novo. State v. Thiel, 2003 WI 111, ¶24, 264
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862617 - 2024-10-16
the defendant received constitutionally ineffective assistance de novo. State v. Thiel, 2003 WI 111, ¶24, 264
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862617 - 2024-10-16
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and whether the deficiency prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33046 - 2008-06-16
was deficient and whether the deficiency prejudiced the defense are questions of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33046 - 2008-06-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
solely from the criminal complaint, this court reviews the circuit court’s ruling de novo. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=793415 - 2024-04-25
solely from the criminal complaint, this court reviews the circuit court’s ruling de novo. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=793415 - 2024-04-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
solely from the criminal complaint, this court reviews the circuit court’s ruling de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=793415 - 2024-04-25
solely from the criminal complaint, this court reviews the circuit court’s ruling de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=793415 - 2024-04-25