Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15161 - 15170 of 29751 for des.
Search results 15161 - 15170 of 29751 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Dustin W. B.
of constitutional standards to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Foust, 214
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5191 - 2017-09-19
of constitutional standards to undisputed facts, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Foust, 214
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5191 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Vito George Ambrosia
as applied to established facts is de novo. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis.2d 333, 344, 401 N.W.2d 827, 832
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10076 - 2017-09-19
as applied to established facts is de novo. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis.2d 333, 344, 401 N.W.2d 827, 832
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10076 - 2017-09-19
State v. James Jagodinsky
York, 500 U.S. 352 (1991), that the second Batson prong involves a legal question subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11555 - 2005-03-31
York, 500 U.S. 352 (1991), that the second Batson prong involves a legal question subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11555 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ann M. Zutz v. Gregory S. Zutz
agreement and was instead required to examine their relationship de novo, including the presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10714 - 2017-09-20
agreement and was instead required to examine their relationship de novo, including the presumption
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10714 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a “question of law subject to de novo review.” Id. (italics added). In Schaefer, we summarized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91546 - 2014-09-15
is a “question of law subject to de novo review.” Id. (italics added). In Schaefer, we summarized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91546 - 2014-09-15
State v. John Paul
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. at 236-37. ¶10 On the performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4051 - 2005-03-31
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. at 236-37. ¶10 On the performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4051 - 2005-03-31
Mary A. Cruz v. All Saints Healthcare System, Inc.
of the cross-claims. ¶4 We review a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. Waters v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6399 - 2005-03-31
of the cross-claims. ¶4 We review a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. Waters v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6399 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald C. Foust
the application of constitutional standards to undisputed facts. It is thus a question of law, which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12105 - 2005-03-31
the application of constitutional standards to undisputed facts. It is thus a question of law, which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12105 - 2005-03-31
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6203 - 2005-03-31
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6203 - 2005-03-31
State v. John F. Draves
prejudiced the defense are questions of law which we review de novo. See id. at 25, 496 N.W.2d at 104-05
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10859 - 2005-03-31
prejudiced the defense are questions of law which we review de novo. See id. at 25, 496 N.W.2d at 104-05
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10859 - 2005-03-31