Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15171 - 15180 of 29757 for des.
Search results 15171 - 15180 of 29757 for des.
State v. Chris C. Lichtenberg
to a speedy trial has been violated is a constitutional question we review de novo, although we will uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5602 - 2005-03-31
to a speedy trial has been violated is a constitutional question we review de novo, although we will uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5602 - 2005-03-31
State v. John D. Meindl
of a statute.[7] Statutory interpretation is a question of law, which we review de novo. County of Dane v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18687 - 2005-06-22
of a statute.[7] Statutory interpretation is a question of law, which we review de novo. County of Dane v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18687 - 2005-06-22
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law[,] which we review de novo.” Id. (quoting Three & One Co. v. Geilfuss, 178 Wis. 2d 400
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108174 - 2014-02-18
is a question of law[,] which we review de novo.” Id. (quoting Three & One Co. v. Geilfuss, 178 Wis. 2d 400
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108174 - 2014-02-18
COURT OF APPEALS
findings of historical fact unless clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59437 - 2011-02-01
findings of historical fact unless clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59437 - 2011-02-01
State v. John Tereschko
is therefore de novo. In re D.S.P., 166 Wis. 2d 464, 471, 480 N.W.2d 234 (1992). On review of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3351 - 2005-03-31
is therefore de novo. In re D.S.P., 166 Wis. 2d 464, 471, 480 N.W.2d 234 (1992). On review of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3351 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Assessing harmless error presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95725 - 2013-04-23
. Assessing harmless error presents a question of law we review de novo. State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95725 - 2013-04-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we consider de novo. See id. 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216088 - 2018-07-31
a question of law that we consider de novo. See id. 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216088 - 2018-07-31
Nathaniel Allen Lindell v. Jon E. Litscher
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: Robert De Chambeau, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6890 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: Robert De Chambeau, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6890 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, these alleged errors are de minimis. DuPuis postconviction motion describes correction of these errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31408 - 2008-01-07
, these alleged errors are de minimis. DuPuis postconviction motion describes correction of these errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31408 - 2008-01-07
State v. David J. Baertschi
defense, are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633-34, 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15607 - 2005-03-31
defense, are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633-34, 369
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15607 - 2005-03-31