Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15181 - 15190 of 58951 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 15181 - 15190 of 58951 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Robert M. v. City of Franklin
The Strzelecs live on property in the City of Franklin. The Contis live next door. The Strzelecs claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2619 - 2005-03-31
The Strzelecs live on property in the City of Franklin. The Contis live next door. The Strzelecs claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2619 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. sued Sandra Roney, doing business as Roney Images, for breach of contract; Roney counter-claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35199 - 2014-09-15
. sued Sandra Roney, doing business as Roney Images, for breach of contract; Roney counter-claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35199 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, for breach of contract; Roney counter-claimed for negligent misrepresentation. A jury awarded Associated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35199 - 2009-01-12
, for breach of contract; Roney counter-claimed for negligent misrepresentation. A jury awarded Associated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35199 - 2009-01-12
[PDF]
Douglass H. Bartley v. Tommy G. Thompson
to nominate him to another term on the commission. He claimed that he had a "binding contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8307 - 2017-09-19
to nominate him to another term on the commission. He claimed that he had a "binding contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8307 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Robert M. v. City of Franklin
of Franklin. The Contis live next door. The Strzelecs claim that Mark and Diane Origers, who owned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2619 - 2017-09-19
of Franklin. The Contis live next door. The Strzelecs claim that Mark and Diane Origers, who owned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2619 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Henry C. Reget v. Norma Zelazo Paige
dissolution of the corporation based on the same factual allegations that he made to support his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15319 - 2017-09-21
dissolution of the corporation based on the same factual allegations that he made to support his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15319 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
or claim arising out of the agreement. The arbitration clauses would not apply, however, in the event
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103384 - 2013-10-23
or claim arising out of the agreement. The arbitration clauses would not apply, however, in the event
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103384 - 2013-10-23
COURT OF APPEALS
relief. We conclude that Jackson is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the only claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31655 - 2008-01-28
relief. We conclude that Jackson is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the only claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31655 - 2008-01-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not have been dismissed, asserting that if those claims were successful, they would be entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136997 - 2017-09-21
not have been dismissed, asserting that if those claims were successful, they would be entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136997 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Antonio Valtierrez
prosecution witnesses; and (3) call him to testify in support of his self-defense claim. We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5517 - 2017-09-19
prosecution witnesses; and (3) call him to testify in support of his self-defense claim. We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5517 - 2017-09-19