Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15181 - 15190 of 83864 for case number.
Search results 15181 - 15190 of 83864 for case number.
[PDF]
State v. Samuel J.G.
, 376 N.W.2d 385, 389 (Ct. App. 1985). In this case, the court examined the appropriate statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10742 - 2017-09-20
, 376 N.W.2d 385, 389 (Ct. App. 1985). In this case, the court examined the appropriate statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10742 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. There is no arguable merit to a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence in this case. The testimony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210727 - 2018-04-03
. There is no arguable merit to a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence in this case. The testimony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210727 - 2018-04-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=434504 - 2021-10-06
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=434504 - 2021-10-06
[PDF]
Ruven George Seibert v. Phillip Macht
2002 WI 12 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 99-3354-W COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17592 - 2017-09-21
2002 WI 12 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 99-3354-W COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17592 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jessica A. Kunze
to be determined by the trier of fact, which in this case was the trial judge. See State v. Carter, 229 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2872 - 2005-03-31
to be determined by the trier of fact, which in this case was the trial judge. See State v. Carter, 229 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2872 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rodney C.M.
from the state. ΒΆ2 An original dispositional order was entered in this case on March 16, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5728 - 2005-03-31
from the state. ΒΆ2 An original dispositional order was entered in this case on March 16, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5728 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
to an automatic reduction of child support. Id. In this case, Hunter was first born to Schulz and Mayer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30513 - 2014-09-15
to an automatic reduction of child support. Id. In this case, Hunter was first born to Schulz and Mayer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30513 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David A. H.
a number of relevant cases. It acknowledged that the defense expert was well qualified and that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3558 - 2017-09-19
a number of relevant cases. It acknowledged that the defense expert was well qualified and that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3558 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Village of Tigerton v. Donald Minniecheske
that the No. 95-3404 -2- appellants' statement of the case mixes numerous trial court cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10083 - 2017-09-19
that the No. 95-3404 -2- appellants' statement of the case mixes numerous trial court cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10083 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=462879 - 2021-12-15
this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=462879 - 2021-12-15