Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15181 - 15190 of 29827 for des.
Search results 15181 - 15190 of 29827 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the ambiguity. Id., ¶¶47-48 (citation omitted). Questions of statutory language are reviewed de novo. Myers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883808 - 2024-12-03
the ambiguity. Id., ¶¶47-48 (citation omitted). Questions of statutory language are reviewed de novo. Myers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883808 - 2024-12-03
[PDF]
Waukesha County v. Markus Meinhardt
which we also review de novo. State v. Baudhuin, 141 Wis. 2d 642, 648-49, 416 N.W.2d 60 (1987). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3547 - 2017-09-19
which we also review de novo. State v. Baudhuin, 141 Wis. 2d 642, 648-49, 416 N.W.2d 60 (1987). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3547 - 2017-09-19
State v. Gabriel R.M.
of a statute and its application to undisputed facts presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10138 - 2005-03-31
of a statute and its application to undisputed facts presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10138 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996)]. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32889 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996)]. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32889 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
David J. Gehl v. Peter Conrad
of that discretion involves a question of law, we review the question de novo, benefiting from the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26120 - 2017-09-21
of that discretion involves a question of law, we review the question de novo, benefiting from the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26120 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, as we do any written instrument. See Waters v. Waters, 2007 WI App 40, ¶6, 300 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110388 - 2017-09-21
judgment de novo, as we do any written instrument. See Waters v. Waters, 2007 WI App 40, ¶6, 300 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110388 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo, however, whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77920 - 2014-09-15
review de novo, however, whether the trial court has applied the correct legal standard. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77920 - 2014-09-15
State v. James C. Berlin
statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law subject to de novo review. Id. at 137-38, 456 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9373 - 2005-03-31
statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law subject to de novo review. Id. at 137-38, 456 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9373 - 2005-03-31
David L. Gilbert v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
review de novo. Ansani v. Cascade Mountain, Inc., 223 Wis. 2d 39, 45, 588 N.W.2d 321 (Ct. App. 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2903 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. Ansani v. Cascade Mountain, Inc., 223 Wis. 2d 39, 45, 588 N.W.2d 321 (Ct. App. 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2903 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
to State a Claim ¶7 Whether a complaint states a claim is a question of law we review de novo. Beloit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28120 - 2014-09-15
to State a Claim ¶7 Whether a complaint states a claim is a question of law we review de novo. Beloit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28120 - 2014-09-15