Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15181 - 15190 of 65884 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 15181 - 15190 of 65884 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and Oliver’s responses, and following an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903012 - 2025-01-22
of the no-merit report and Oliver’s responses, and following an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903012 - 2025-01-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no- merit report and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241844 - 2019-06-06
of the no- merit report and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241844 - 2019-06-06
[PDF]
State v. Calvin Matthew
an adequate record of the “strong proof of guilt” required to accept an Alford plea. State v. Garcia, 192
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9664 - 2017-09-19
an adequate record of the “strong proof of guilt” required to accept an Alford plea. State v. Garcia, 192
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9664 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2012AP1583-CRNM 2 but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105380 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2012AP1583-CRNM 2 but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105380 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report raising several challenges to his conviction. Upon review of the record and the submissions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197721 - 2017-10-10
report raising several challenges to his conviction. Upon review of the record and the submissions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197721 - 2017-10-10
Langlade County Department of Human Services v. Ashleigh P.
by the record. We agree and reverse the order and remand for a new dispositional hearing. FACTS ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6006 - 2005-03-31
by the record. We agree and reverse the order and remand for a new dispositional hearing. FACTS ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6006 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109858 - 2017-09-21
of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109858 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
review of the record as required by Anders and Rule 809.32, we conclude that no issue of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117319 - 2014-07-22
review of the record as required by Anders and Rule 809.32, we conclude that no issue of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117319 - 2014-07-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2020AP1048-CRNM 2 independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=602060 - 2022-12-21
. No. 2020AP1048-CRNM 2 independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=602060 - 2022-12-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a supplemental no-merit report. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795923 - 2024-05-07
a supplemental no-merit report. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=795923 - 2024-05-07