Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15181 - 15190 of 65884 for divorce records/1000.

[PDF] Langlade County Department of Human Services v. Ashleigh P.
not supported by the record. We agree and reverse the order and remand for a new dispositional hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6006 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103479 - 2013-10-23

State v. Jason D. Schultz
. 1987). An appellate court will search the record to determine whether the record supports the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8666 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, and an independent review of the record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868381 - 2024-10-29

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and Oliver’s responses, and following an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903012 - 2025-01-22

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the no- merit report and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241844 - 2019-06-06

[PDF] State v. Calvin Matthew
an adequate record of the “strong proof of guilt” required to accept an Alford plea. State v. Garcia, 192
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9664 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. No. 2012AP1583-CRNM 2 but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105380 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
report raising several challenges to his conviction. Upon review of the record and the submissions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197721 - 2017-10-10

Langlade County Department of Human Services v. Ashleigh P.
by the record. We agree and reverse the order and remand for a new dispositional hearing. FACTS ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6006 - 2005-03-31