Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15181 - 15190 of 54447 for linda s blake obituary 1984.

COURT OF APPEALS
, 687 (1984). Under this framework, DeMint must demonstrate that his counsel’s representation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131603 - 2014-12-16

State v. Andrew N. Bauerfield
. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). Deficient performance requires a showing that defense counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25758 - 2006-07-04

[PDF] CA Blank Order
criminal sentence.” State v. Gavigan, 122 Wis. 2d 389, 393, 362 N.W.2d 162 (Ct. App. 1984); see State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840040 - 2024-08-20

COURT OF APPEALS
(1984). We need not address both components of the analysis if the appellant makes an inadequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61073 - 2011-03-15

[PDF] Town of Delavan v. Stuart G. Lenhoff
.2d 12 (Ct. App. 1984). We will uphold the trial court’s decision as long as it has a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15874 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and prejudice. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). When a defendant claims ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163624 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Ray A. Peterson v. Regina K. Buie
, e.g., State v. Wilks, 117 Wis. 2d 495, 503, 345 N.W.2d 498 (Ct. App. 1984). ¶7 Peterson contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5044 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and that the deficiency prejudiced the defense. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). In denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943915 - 2025-04-22

[PDF] Frank Nordstrom v. Wisconsin Mutual Insurance Company
, 97 (Ct. App. 1984). However, an insured's recovery under the policy is favored when the insured
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11860 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 655, 663-64, 348 N.W.2d 527 (1984). Appellate court deference considers that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195010 - 2017-09-21