Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15191 - 15200 of 83861 for case number.
Search results 15191 - 15200 of 83861 for case number.
[PDF]
State v. Rodney C.M.
An original dispositional order was entered in this case on March 16, 2001, and was to expire on January 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5728 - 2017-09-19
An original dispositional order was entered in this case on March 16, 2001, and was to expire on January 25
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5728 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, an operating after revocation charge in a Wood County case was dismissed and read in. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96657 - 2014-09-15
, an operating after revocation charge in a Wood County case was dismissed and read in. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96657 - 2014-09-15
[MS WORD]
SC-506A: Order for Financial Disclosure (Small Claims)
: Order for Financial Disclosure (Small Claims) Case No. IT IS ORDERED: The judgment debtor
/formdisplay/SC-506A.doc?formNumber=SC-506A&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2019-10-02
: Order for Financial Disclosure (Small Claims) Case No. IT IS ORDERED: The judgment debtor
/formdisplay/SC-506A.doc?formNumber=SC-506A&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2019-10-02
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Joseph Engl
2005 WI 102 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2005AP838-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18880 - 2005-07-05
2005 WI 102 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2005AP838-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18880 - 2005-07-05
[PDF]
State v. Gregory Mosley
with phone and pager numbers on them. She then asked Mosley to remove his unlaced athletic shoes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2749 - 2017-09-19
with phone and pager numbers on them. She then asked Mosley to remove his unlaced athletic shoes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2749 - 2017-09-19
State v. David A. H.
the witness from testifying and affirm. ¶2 The charges in this case arose from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3558 - 2005-03-31
the witness from testifying and affirm. ¶2 The charges in this case arose from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3558 - 2005-03-31
State v. Judy A. Garbow Swanson
, 451 N.W.2d 752 (1990). Swanson’s case was tried before a jury, and this court concludes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25213 - 2006-05-22
, 451 N.W.2d 752 (1990). Swanson’s case was tried before a jury, and this court concludes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25213 - 2006-05-22
State v. Samuel J.G.
253, 259, 376 N.W.2d 385, 389 (Ct. App. 1985). In this case, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10742 - 2005-03-31
253, 259, 376 N.W.2d 385, 389 (Ct. App. 1985). In this case, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10742 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Samuel J.G.
, 376 N.W.2d 385, 389 (Ct. App. 1985). In this case, the court examined the appropriate statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10742 - 2017-09-20
, 376 N.W.2d 385, 389 (Ct. App. 1985). In this case, the court examined the appropriate statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10742 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. There is no arguable merit to a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence in this case. The testimony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210727 - 2018-04-03
. There is no arguable merit to a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence in this case. The testimony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210727 - 2018-04-03