Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15191 - 15200 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
Search results 15191 - 15200 of 29996 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo.” Id. ¶4 We need not address both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612475 - 2023-01-20
and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo.” Id. ¶4 We need not address both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612475 - 2023-01-20
[PDF]
State v. Willie J. Hickles
, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” Bentley, 201 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26217 - 2017-09-21
, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” Bentley, 201 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26217 - 2017-09-21
Village of Oregon v. Mark A. Feiler
review de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct. App. 1991). "The question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10746 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct. App. 1991). "The question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10746 - 2005-03-31
Karen Sann v. Badger Care-A-Vans, Inc.
The issue presented is one of statutory construction, a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4371 - 2005-03-31
The issue presented is one of statutory construction, a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4371 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 128. A. Objection to “Escape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81988 - 2012-05-02
and, if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 128. A. Objection to “Escape
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81988 - 2012-05-02
COURT OF APPEALS
: linda m. van de water, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, J.[1] Judith M. Paulick appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34029 - 2008-09-16
: linda m. van de water, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SNYDER, J.[1] Judith M. Paulick appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34029 - 2008-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS
amounts to ineffective assistance is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Thiel, 2003 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118321 - 2014-07-29
amounts to ineffective assistance is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Thiel, 2003 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118321 - 2014-07-29
William Ellingsworth v. Frederick Swiggum
. The construction of a statute when the facts are not disputed presents an issue of law, which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7954 - 2005-03-31
. The construction of a statute when the facts are not disputed presents an issue of law, which this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7954 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Trevor A. McKee
were defective is a matter of law which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11975 - 2017-09-21
were defective is a matter of law which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11975 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Paul M. Nigl
is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶8 Nigl claims that trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6220 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶8 Nigl claims that trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6220 - 2017-09-19