Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15191 - 15200 of 29751 for des.
Search results 15191 - 15200 of 29751 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence Williams
to criminal proceedings by § 972.11(1), STATS.). We review de novo, however, the trial court's findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12432 - 2017-09-21
to criminal proceedings by § 972.11(1), STATS.). We review de novo, however, the trial court's findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12432 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
review de novo. See id., ¶44. ¶7 Although we are not bound by LIRC’s legal conclusions, we may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35614 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. See id., ¶44. ¶7 Although we are not bound by LIRC’s legal conclusions, we may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35614 - 2014-09-15
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6215 - 2005-03-31
lost competency to proceed presents a question of law that we review de novo without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6215 - 2005-03-31
Martin C. H. v. Jill E. S.
Jill asked for de novo review in circuit court. Following a trial, the court’s final order was entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25682 - 2006-06-26
Jill asked for de novo review in circuit court. Following a trial, the court’s final order was entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25682 - 2006-06-26
James Reese v. City of Pewaukee
we review de novo. Tobler v. Door County, 158 Wis. 2d 19, 21, 461 N.W.2d 775 (1990). ¶5 B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3780 - 2005-03-31
we review de novo. Tobler v. Door County, 158 Wis. 2d 19, 21, 461 N.W.2d 775 (1990). ¶5 B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3780 - 2005-03-31
Evelyn Ferrer v. David I. Lopez
, or its application to undisputed facts, is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Ansani v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15406 - 2005-03-31
, or its application to undisputed facts, is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Ansani v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15406 - 2005-03-31
N.E.M. v. Eugene Strigel
), Stats. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law which we review de novo. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8782 - 2005-03-31
), Stats. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law which we review de novo. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8782 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Larry G. Edwards
not raise a "new issue" presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. ¶8 Neither party
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16577 - 2017-09-21
not raise a "new issue" presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. ¶8 Neither party
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16577 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dale Iversen
was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14229 - 2005-03-31
was deficient and prejudicial is a question of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14229 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
/Mann hearing is de novo. See Manuel, 213 Wis. 2d at 315. Upon our independent review, we have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=819712 - 2024-07-02
/Mann hearing is de novo. See Manuel, 213 Wis. 2d at 315. Upon our independent review, we have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=819712 - 2024-07-02