Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15191 - 15200 of 68502 for did.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
ruling but that any erroneously admitted evidence did not unfairly prejudice Gunn. The court explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1079014 - 2026-02-17

State v. Michael R. Sturgeon
David Danz. Sturgeon admitted to Danz that while he did go to the door and ask R.J.W.’s grandmother
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14596 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Robert J. Stynes
of the convictions by only one calendar day, we determine that the misstatement did not meaningfully change
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16620 - 2017-09-21

Mary K. Sulzer v. Mary Susan Diedrich
, the QDRO exception to the WRS restrictions did not apply to marriages terminated prior to April 28, 1990
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16581 - 2005-03-31

State v. Johnnie Carprue
an adversarial process and did not constitute harmless error, we reverse and remand for a new trial. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5787 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Johnnie Carprue
court’s actions reflected an adversarial process and did not constitute harmless error, we reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5787 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a thorough plea colloquy. There was no evidence taken at the plea colloquy, nor did any witnesses testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768838 - 2024-02-28

[PDF] Mary K. Sulzer v. Mary Susan Diedrich
to the account holding the deferred compensation benefits as the Copeland account, as did the circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16581 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Willow Creek Ranch, L.L.C. v. Town of Shelby
zoning ordinances. In addition, the Town and County did not act arbitrarily or in excess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13526 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
there was sufficient evidence presented at trial. However, we agree with Smith that he did not waive his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64702 - 2011-05-25