Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15191 - 15200 of 83431 for simple case search.

[PDF] State v. Karl M. Gebhard
), overruled on other grounds by State v. Richards, 123 Wis.2d 1, 365 N.W.2d 7 (1985). For cases which fall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12298 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Clinton L. Duhm
for operating with a suspended license and a violation of the absolute sobriety law. During an ensuing search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6098 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
,” and therefore Wis. Stat. § 767.451(3) applied to this case rather than § 767.451(1).[3] ¶7 The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81584 - 2012-04-30

State v. Karl M. Gebhard
v. Richards, 123 Wis.2d 1, 365 N.W.2d 7 (1985). For cases which fall in the “twilight zone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12298 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
tactics in this case. As to the first issue, again, it comes down to credibility. And here I find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92203 - 2013-01-28

State v. Peter Jay Bartram
. On March 23, 1998, members of the State Line Area Narcotics Team (SLANT) executed a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15790 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Loretta M. Gilmeister v. Eugene Zdroik & Sons, Inc.
, the real estate. Ag Services did not do a title search before taking the real estate as security
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2119 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Gordon Dain
of this testimony to the charges in this case or how this evidence would have altered the outcome of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13809 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Steven Levsen v. Medical College of Wisconsin
searched for the samples, which were kept in straws, and found some of them at the bottom of the storage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15252 - 2017-09-21

State v. Martin Anthony Azevedo
in this drunk driving case. The State argues that the trial court erred in suppressing all evidence gathered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4695 - 2005-03-31