Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1521 - 1530 of 17422 for Cost.
Search results 1521 - 1530 of 17422 for Cost.
COURT OF APPEALS
without determining his ability to pay. Correlatively, he objected to the $1200 added as costs because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108576 - 2014-03-04
without determining his ability to pay. Correlatively, he objected to the $1200 added as costs because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108576 - 2014-03-04
[PDF]
Thomas W. Reimann v. Dale Poliak
Poliak is the manager of the Health Services Unit. Reimann claims costs, fees and damages under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8362 - 2017-09-19
Poliak is the manager of the Health Services Unit. Reimann claims costs, fees and damages under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8362 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI 124
Attorney Robinson to pay the costs of the reinstatement proceeding, which total $4151.02 as of September
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27090 - 2014-09-15
Attorney Robinson to pay the costs of the reinstatement proceeding, which total $4151.02 as of September
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27090 - 2014-09-15
Durand Cooperatives v. Dennis Emmert
of $1,232.12. They claim that the judgment, based on the cost of seed received by them from Durand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12417 - 2005-03-31
of $1,232.12. They claim that the judgment, based on the cost of seed received by them from Durand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12417 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, she argues that the replacement cost of the large, living trees was $152,534.88 as calculated by her
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142458 - 2015-05-20
, she argues that the replacement cost of the large, living trees was $152,534.88 as calculated by her
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142458 - 2015-05-20
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thomas A. Fadner
for professional misconduct, and that he be required to pay the costs of this proceeding. Attorney Fadner's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21510 - 2006-02-23
for professional misconduct, and that he be required to pay the costs of this proceeding. Attorney Fadner's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21510 - 2006-02-23
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thomas A. Fadner
, and that he be required to pay the costs of this proceeding. Attorney Fadner's misconduct involved his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21510 - 2017-09-21
, and that he be required to pay the costs of this proceeding. Attorney Fadner's misconduct involved his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21510 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We also deny Julie Jaszczenski’s motion for frivolous appeal costs as untimely. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156570 - 2017-09-21
. We also deny Julie Jaszczenski’s motion for frivolous appeal costs as untimely. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156570 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Comments on Supreme Court rul 16-05 received from the Hon. Lisa K. Stark
business cases and reducing litigation costs, improving the quality and predictability of justice
/supreme/docs/1605commentsstark.pdf - 2017-01-19
business cases and reducing litigation costs, improving the quality and predictability of justice
/supreme/docs/1605commentsstark.pdf - 2017-01-19
Kenneth M. Neiman v. David L. Larson
(the defendants) attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $4,404.46. Neiman also appeals from a subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12073 - 2005-03-31
(the defendants) attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $4,404.46. Neiman also appeals from a subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12073 - 2005-03-31