Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1521 - 1530 of 17369 for Cost.
Search results 1521 - 1530 of 17369 for Cost.
Kenneth M. Neiman v. David L. Larson
(the defendants) attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $4,404.46. Neiman also appeals from a subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12073 - 2005-03-31
(the defendants) attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $4,404.46. Neiman also appeals from a subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12073 - 2005-03-31
Kenneth M. Neiman v. David L. Larson
(the defendants) attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $4,404.46. Neiman also appeals from a subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12399 - 2005-03-31
(the defendants) attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $4,404.46. Neiman also appeals from a subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12399 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Comments on Supreme Court rul 16-05 received from the Hon. Lisa K. Stark
business cases and reducing litigation costs, improving the quality and predictability of justice
/supreme/docs/1605commentsstark.pdf - 2017-01-19
business cases and reducing litigation costs, improving the quality and predictability of justice
/supreme/docs/1605commentsstark.pdf - 2017-01-19
[PDF]
Russell A. Sleight v. Vicki L. Sleight
. Vicki also appeals that part of the judgment awarding attorney fees and costs to Russell’s brother
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6848 - 2017-09-20
. Vicki also appeals that part of the judgment awarding attorney fees and costs to Russell’s brother
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6848 - 2017-09-20
Steve Uselmann v. Shawn Klinzing
awarding Klinzing costs and attorney fees. ¶2 In April 2003, Klinzing contracted with Uselmann
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24798 - 2006-04-11
awarding Klinzing costs and attorney fees. ¶2 In April 2003, Klinzing contracted with Uselmann
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24798 - 2006-04-11
CA Blank Order
. David A. Day appeals from an order denying his motion to reduce the fine and costs reflected on his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138452 - 2015-03-31
. David A. Day appeals from an order denying his motion to reduce the fine and costs reflected on his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138452 - 2015-03-31
Harold Larson v. Forest Hill Memorial Park
court ordered judgment for Larson against Forest Hill in the sum of $945 plus costs. In doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14089 - 2005-03-31
court ordered judgment for Larson against Forest Hill in the sum of $945 plus costs. In doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14089 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Harold Larson v. Forest Hill Memorial Park
Forest Hill in the sum of $945 plus costs. In doing so, the court dismissed Larson’s claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14089 - 2014-09-15
Forest Hill in the sum of $945 plus costs. In doing so, the court dismissed Larson’s claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14089 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and bathroom. For that work, the Derricks agreed to pay $21,354.19 for labor plus the cost of materials
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90981 - 2013-01-02
and bathroom. For that work, the Derricks agreed to pay $21,354.19 for labor plus the cost of materials
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90981 - 2013-01-02
COURT OF APPEALS
for the $43,992 indemnification amount. The court also ordered that a judgment be issued for Nelson’s costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68666 - 2011-07-27
for the $43,992 indemnification amount. The court also ordered that a judgment be issued for Nelson’s costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68666 - 2011-07-27