Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1521 - 1530 of 30059 for de.
Search results 1521 - 1530 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for de novo review. See WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8). An initial de novo review hearing was held on November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980295 - 2025-07-08
for de novo review. See WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8). An initial de novo review hearing was held on November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980295 - 2025-07-08
Siu Wing Leung v. City of Lake Geneva
interpretation, our standard of review is de novo. State v. Isaac J.R., 220 Wis. 2d 251, 255, 582 N.W.2d 476 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5771 - 2005-03-31
interpretation, our standard of review is de novo. State v. Isaac J.R., 220 Wis. 2d 251, 255, 582 N.W.2d 476 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5771 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶7 We apply a de novo standard of review to questions of statutory interpretation. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86474 - 2014-09-15
). ¶7 We apply a de novo standard of review to questions of statutory interpretation. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86474 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Schultz’s. Schultz appeals. ¶5 We review summary judgment determinations de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144920 - 2017-09-21
Schultz’s. Schultz appeals. ¶5 We review summary judgment determinations de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144920 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 31, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
the motion and Matuszek was convicted. ¶3 We review de novo questions of statutory construction when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27979 - 2007-01-30
the motion and Matuszek was convicted. ¶3 We review de novo questions of statutory construction when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27979 - 2007-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS
subject to de novo review. See State v. Jensen, 2010 WI 38, ¶8, 324 Wis. 2d 586, 782 N.W.2d 415
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94665 - 2013-04-02
subject to de novo review. See State v. Jensen, 2010 WI 38, ¶8, 324 Wis. 2d 586, 782 N.W.2d 415
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94665 - 2013-04-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for de novo review. See WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8). An initial de novo review hearing was held on November
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980295 - 2025-07-08
for de novo review. See WIS. STAT. § 757.69(8). An initial de novo review hearing was held on November
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980295 - 2025-07-08
96 CV 1749 William A. Pangman v. Richard William King
De Chambeau Trial Court Judge City-County Bldg. 210 Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd. Madison, WI 53709
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14076 - 2005-03-31
De Chambeau Trial Court Judge City-County Bldg. 210 Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd. Madison, WI 53709
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14076 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to do so. Analysis ¶3 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159268 - 2017-09-21
to do so. Analysis ¶3 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159268 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
divisible or nondivisible is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. The burden of showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85990 - 2014-09-15
divisible or nondivisible is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id. The burden of showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85990 - 2014-09-15