Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1521 - 1530 of 4454 for neg.
Search results 1521 - 1530 of 4454 for neg.
County of Jefferson v. James I. Krause
that the officer’s conduct negatively affected Krause’s ability to choose whether to take the alternative test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5479 - 2005-03-31
that the officer’s conduct negatively affected Krause’s ability to choose whether to take the alternative test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5479 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that phrase carries an unjustified negative connotation, the term “erroneous exercise of discretion” is now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47037 - 2010-02-16
that phrase carries an unjustified negative connotation, the term “erroneous exercise of discretion” is now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47037 - 2010-02-16
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Lilly
a negative inference from Lilly's testimony that he asked for a lawyer. We affirm the trial court's denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9492 - 2017-09-19
a negative inference from Lilly's testimony that he asked for a lawyer. We affirm the trial court's denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9492 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
character, and the court explained that it took into account this negative character information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46217 - 2014-09-15
character, and the court explained that it took into account this negative character information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46217 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
testified that originally Julie’s drug screens were negative but once Julie was off probation, the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61418 - 2011-03-21
testified that originally Julie’s drug screens were negative but once Julie was off probation, the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61418 - 2011-03-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
not used the term “abuse of discretion” since 1992 because of its unjustified negative connotations. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33445 - 2014-09-15
not used the term “abuse of discretion” since 1992 because of its unjustified negative connotations. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33445 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not be held responsible for Howland’s own witnesses blurting out the negative information. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74965 - 2014-09-15
not be held responsible for Howland’s own witnesses blurting out the negative information. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74965 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Tommy Brown v. Gary R. McCaughtry
of it for testing, with negative results. Tommy apparently believed that Waupun Correctional’s water came from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20070 - 2017-09-21
of it for testing, with negative results. Tommy apparently believed that Waupun Correctional’s water came from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20070 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Melissa Newkirk v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
the statute. We answered the question in the negative, stating: The … argument [that the form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14640 - 2017-09-21
the statute. We answered the question in the negative, stating: The … argument [that the form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14640 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
would be expensive, would have substantial negative tax consequences for Specht, would not obtain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98455 - 2014-09-15
would be expensive, would have substantial negative tax consequences for Specht, would not obtain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98455 - 2014-09-15