Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1521 - 1530 of 2420 for ny.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, in the context of restitution in a criminal case, means “[a]ny readily ascertainable pecuniary expenditure paid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=339932 - 2021-02-25

Sandra L. Shirk v. Bowling, Inc.
a judgment if there are "[a]ny other reasons justifying relief from the operation of the judgment." The test
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17466 - 2005-03-31

Gregory T. Isermann v. MBL Life Assurance Corporation
was obligated to address his claim for a declaratory judgment because § 806.04(2), Stats., provides that “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14577 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
education following the divorce, whereas “[a]ny benefit [Romero] gets from this education will end
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=826600 - 2024-07-16

[PDF] WI APP 270
. Pointing to the declaration’s language that “[a]ny lease or oral or written rental agreement …” does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30987 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Timothy Scott Bailey Smith, Sr.
that “[a]ny person who intentionally fails for 120 or more consecutive days to provide … child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6621 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] R.A. Nielsen v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
.” Section 448.02(3), STATS. The definition of “unprofessional conduct” includes “[a]ny practice or conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14226 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] P
or th is r ea so n m ay n ot b e ci te d in a ny c ou rt o f th is s ta te
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40636 - 2014-09-15

James A. Mentek, Jr. v. Gerald Berge
[1] including “[m]istake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect,” § 806.07(1)(a), and “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13844 - 2005-03-31

2007 WI APP 111
that the court may consider “[a]ny other factor that the court determines is relevant.” Sec. 767.32(1)(c)4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28319 - 2007-04-26