Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15201 - 15210 of 29996 for consulta de causas.

State v. Tecia D.B.
termination of parental rights is a legal issue subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6835 - 2005-03-31

State v. Roland A. Smart
in smaller counties were allowed to seek de novo review. Id. at ¶6. The supreme court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4996 - 2005-03-31

Robert E. Bowman v. Dane County Board of Adjustment
which we review de novo. Browndale Int’l, Ltd. v. Board of Adjustment for Dane County, 60 Wis.2d 182
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11252 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
granting summary judgment. Id. Our review is de novo. Id. ¶6 Lemel makes two arguments. First, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29760 - 2007-07-23

Gerald T. Schaetz v. Town of Scott
of law this court reviews de novo. State ex rel. Sielen v. Milwaukee County Cir. Ct., 176 Wis.2d 101
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13792 - 2005-03-31

Wilma Wendt v. United Government Services
] ¶5 We review a trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. Waters v. United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7113 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Christina Bellon v. Ripon College
is de novo. Gross v. Woodman’s Food Mkt., Inc., 2002 WI App 295, ¶30, 259 Wis. 2d 181, 655 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7330 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. John C. Clincy
demands is a question of law subject to de novo review. See id. “‘[W]hen a policeman has made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12379 - 2017-09-21

Lincoln Savings Bank v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
decision, we need not resolve that multi-layered conundrum here because even under de novo review we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10245 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Raul M. Cordova
556 N.W.2d 687, 692 (1996). If the finding is one of constitutional fact, we will review it de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14185 - 2014-09-15