Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 15201 - 15210 of 29823 for des.
Search results 15201 - 15210 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Teachers’ Educ. Ass’n, 93 Wis. 2d 415, 422, 287 N.W.2d 131 (1980). Consequently, our de novo appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101464 - 2017-09-21
Teachers’ Educ. Ass’n, 93 Wis. 2d 415, 422, 287 N.W.2d 131 (1980). Consequently, our de novo appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101464 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consider de novo whether the facts demonstrate a violation of constitutional principles. See id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226064 - 2018-10-30
consider de novo whether the facts demonstrate a violation of constitutional principles. See id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226064 - 2018-10-30
[PDF]
State v. John E. Taylor
is a legal conclusion, not a finding of fact, and thus our review is de No. 98-0417-CR 5 novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13626 - 2017-09-21
is a legal conclusion, not a finding of fact, and thus our review is de No. 98-0417-CR 5 novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13626 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Darwin J. Pamanet
, however, are questions of law this court reviews de novo. Id. at 137-38; 456 N.W.2d at 833
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13604 - 2017-09-21
, however, are questions of law this court reviews de novo. Id. at 137-38; 456 N.W.2d at 833
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13604 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
presents a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258, ¶26, 268 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872275 - 2024-11-06
presents a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258, ¶26, 268 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872275 - 2024-11-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the ambiguity. Id., ¶¶47-48 (citation omitted). Questions of statutory language are reviewed de novo. Myers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883808 - 2024-12-03
the ambiguity. Id., ¶¶47-48 (citation omitted). Questions of statutory language are reviewed de novo. Myers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883808 - 2024-12-03
[PDF]
Waukesha County v. Markus Meinhardt
which we also review de novo. State v. Baudhuin, 141 Wis. 2d 642, 648-49, 416 N.W.2d 60 (1987). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3547 - 2017-09-19
which we also review de novo. State v. Baudhuin, 141 Wis. 2d 642, 648-49, 416 N.W.2d 60 (1987). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3547 - 2017-09-19
State v. Gabriel R.M.
of a statute and its application to undisputed facts presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10138 - 2005-03-31
of a statute and its application to undisputed facts presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10138 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996)]. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32889 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. [State v.] Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d [303,] 309-10[, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996)]. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32889 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
David J. Gehl v. Peter Conrad
of that discretion involves a question of law, we review the question de novo, benefiting from the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26120 - 2017-09-21
of that discretion involves a question of law, we review the question de novo, benefiting from the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26120 - 2017-09-21